In a capitalist society, independent nations need to compete to survive. In a Global Community, all people on this planet would become One Community. There would be no need to compete because everyone would receive what they need to live a comfortable life. In return, everyone would contribute their skills to the Global Community. The planet's resources would be shared rather than exploited by private ownership and competitive control.
Up until now, dictatorial corporations have controlled the resources. Any governing body that is not accountable to the common people, and does not represent the needs of the common people rather than the wants

of the greedy, is dictatorial.
There has never been a fair governance on this planet. Royal families, Big Business, and violent dictators have always controlled the resources and the common people through fear and political pursuasion.
Pseudo-democracies have replaced some dictatorships but quite often the dictatorial corporations have retained their influence. So -called democratic governments are usually controlled by Royal establishments and Presidential dictatorships. Communist run countries are no different to any other dictatorship. Some are openly declared and others are politically disguised. 
We can't create a better reality by using the same way of thinking that created the reality that we wish to improve. Capitalism is a failure and so are the present Communist endeavours. We can do better!
In a Global Community, there can never be a controlling body that enjoys hierarchical privilege and dominance while the common people struggle to survive. It would never be allowed. All people in a Global Community would be declared Common members of that Community. Even though a body of people may have a role to play in the running of the Community, they would never have control of the Community. All roles that benefit the Community would be considered equally important, and all members of the Community would be cared for even if they are incapable of contributing their skills because of physical or mental disabilities. However, rorting the Community would never be allowed. There would always be a role to play somewhere within the Community if a member was deemed capable.
Even though all members of the Community would have everything they need to live a comfortable life, the needs of the Community must be met. Therefore, all members should attempt to contribute a skill that would benefit the Community. Hobbies that did not benefit the Community would be practiced in a member's free time. 
Considering that there would be no cost associated with resources or lifestyle, all members would be educated in a beneficial field or skill. All performing Arts within reason would be considered as beneficial to the Community. Although, there must be a balance of practical, mental, and entertainment skills so that the Community in general can function harmoniously.
Prisons would no longer operate within a Global Community. Considering that all members would have everything they need to live a comfortable life, many crimes would no longer exist. However, in a Global Community, crime would not be tolerated. Any member that intentionally commits a crime would be assessed psychologically and re-educated in the true meaning of Community so they could be treated with Equal importance. 

 

Competition

As previously mentioned, Competition is a quest to prove oneself to be better than another or more entitled than another. It is a quest for hierarchical privilege and dominance. Has competition created happiness?
Games are meant to be FUN. Has the meaning of the word changed? Is it fun to compete for attention and entitlement? Is it fun to be the one that doesn't fare too well in competitive endeavours such as games, education, sports, career opportunities, and supplying the basic needs for yourself or your family? Have we forgotten what it means to be happy, or were we ever taught what true happiness is?
In today's world, happiness is quite often sought from the accumulation of wealth, possessions, and academic esteem. However, attaining wealth, possessions, and academic esteem can be quite arduous. Were we hoping that attainment would make us happy even though the struggle to achieve it may not have been? Have we gone down the wrong path and just don't want to make the effort to try something new? For the higher achievers, this is probably true. For the ones who have always struggled to compete, I would imagine that trying something new could offer a better way of life. However, what if the high achievers are quite happy with having more than everyone else. Is it the high achievers that are now preventing change from occurring? After all, if you have perfected the art of competing, why would you want to give up a lavish lifestyle attained by proving yourself to be a better competitor than everyone else? I suppose it would be easier to associate with your own kind so you don't have to witness the suffering and struggle that poverty and low self-esteem can bring to the competitively challenged. After all, where is the fun in that? 

 

Belief Systems

Can cultural and religious Belief Systems harmonise within a Global Community? Good question! 
As previously stated, competitive behaviour must be eliminated if we wish to create a Global Community that reflects Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for All that is and ALL that will ever Be. Unfortunately, all facets of this reality have been moulded from competitive values. Therefore, to create a Global Community, we must think outside the box. This will be a new and exciting endeavour because Humans in general have never known anything else but survival. The reason for this is Humans have never felt safe on this planet. Fear has confused and corrupted our Thoughts. Trust has never come easy! 
Fear promotes a 'disconnect' between many life forms. Therefore, Fear must be overcome if we wish to attain Peace. What causes Fear? That, is a simple question to answer. Lack of Awareness and information causes Fear. Therefore, a solution to that problem should be simple; raise Awareness and make relevant information available to All. However, culture can play an important role in creating a disconnect. If we wish to reconnect, we must address cultural values and Belief systems. 
In a Global Community, we must have compatible values. They don't necessarily have to be the same, but they must prevent conflict. Therefore, we must be open to change and not entrenched within traditions that promote inequality and disrespect. All practises that reflect inequality and disrespect must be abandoned voluntarily. Forcing people to give up something that they hold dear is not a recipe for Peace. How do we go about that transformation? 
Different cultures, different Belief systems, and different languages developed from isolation. Isolated groups of people needed a way to communicate. Therefore, they developed and shared symbols, gestures, and Beliefs. In this world of shared information, we can evaluate and modify our accumulated Thoughts. We just need a common reference point.
For some reason, the English language is becoming a common form of communication. It may not be seen as a good thing by many. However, it doesn't really matter which language becomes common. What matters, is that we can communicate freely with one another. There are so many different languages that the meaning of a communication sometimes gets lost in the translation. I'm sure that most of us have experienced confusion from a misinterpreted translation.
Religious differences have always created problems. Is there a common thread that holds all religions together? In the past, God-worship was probably the result of Fear, which as we have stated is a consequence of a lack of Awareness and information. In todays world, many are basing their Belief in a God on Love and a need to be watched over or protected. Love is unconditional acceptance.
In my present state of Awareness, I do not Believe in Gods or worship of any kind. It disrespects the SELF to bow down to anyone or anything. However, if Love becomes the common thread, then through Love of one another, it could be possible to overcome our differences. Will Love be enough?
Unconditional acceptance is a big ask. I know that I have problems with unconditionally accepting all behaviour. I don't have a problem with unconditionally accepting other Beings in general. It is their behaviour that I have a problem with. Therefore, Morality must come into play. Morality is experiential judgement. We learn from experience what is compatible behaviour and what is not. If we wish to create a Global Community, Moral Synchronicity is a must.
Synchronicity is Awareness-based, which is a Love-based Sense Agreement. It is also Intellect-based. Therefore, through an interaction and collaboration of Awareness and Intellect, a common thread may manifest. 
In essence, many religions and cultures have a Moral base. Although, experiential judgement can differ greatly. Therefore, Moral Synchronicity, or Synchronised Morality, is necessary to create a Global Community that respects and adheres to common values. Traditional practises can be modified or abandoned to reflect Moral Synchronicity. 

This is a link to the PDF "Moral Synchronicity" gallery/moral synchronicity.pdf

 

Unity and Equality

Do we understand the terms, Unity and Equality? 
Unity is when all parts of a whole are cooperating to achieve a common goal. Equality is when all parts of a whole are considered to be equally important even though they may not be considered to be equally competent. Does this world reflect Unity and Equality?

Competition is a quest to prove oneself to be better than another or more entitled than another. It is a quest for hierarchical privilege and dominance.
Ignorance is a consequence of restricted knowledge or limited Awareness. Arrogance is a consequence of declaring an accumulation of knowledge to be the whole truth. Acceptance that all knowledge is circumstantial, and that our present state of Awareness is partial, helps us to overcome delusions of arrogance and prevent competitive ignorance. If Awareness is always partial, competing for the privilege to be right seems pointless.
Wars are not necessarily fought because of ignorance. They are fought because of arrogance, which is a state of competitive ignorance. If we recognise that life is a state of partial Awareness evolving towards a greater Awareness of SELF, and not a competition to see who is more or less deluded, all Personalities of Mind can become complementary rather than conflictive. 
CHRIST is a term that I use for a state of Mind that wishes no harm to any Being, and seeks not to take advantage of their vulnerable circumstances or conditions. I have amended that statement to read, "a state of Mind that wishes no harm TO any Being or FROM any Being". My reason for this is simple. While we are in a state of conflict, a proportionate defense is probably necessary. Sometimes, even a proportionate defense can inflict harm. However, it isn't necessarily what we do that matters. It is why we are doing it. Morality, which is experiential judgement, is a necessary tool while interacting within a reality that reflects competitive ignorance. 
Revenge has nothing to do with a proportionate defense, or Morality. It seeks to satisfy a personal grudge or a personalised justification for cruelty. Preventing another Being from causing you harm with proportionate actions is defense. Causing harm to others purposefully and without remorse is cruelty. Getting pleasure from causing harm to 'others' is sadistic cruelty. The term, 'others', incorporates Human and animal alike. 

 

Futuristic Dream

If competitive Behaviour was abandoned voluntarily, and the Physical Body evolved into a self-sustaining Entity, could we create a so-called Heaven on Earth? 
Without the need to consume life-forms as a way of sustaining the Body, and without the need to compete for resources or space, all creatures could focus on creating a better way of living. In our present state of Mind, this sounds like a fairy tale. However, if we could change our way of Thinking it wouldn't sound so absurd. 
Thought is the beginning of all creation! It is an infinite source of possible Thoughts. Therefore, through the Pure Potential of Thought, Dreams become reality. 
Thought is Energy, Body is a reflection of Thoughts, and Energy CAN change form! 

 

Realisation

How do we manifest an Ideal from a Thought? What is an Ideal? 

An Ideal is an envisioned Reality based upon, created from, and a reflection of a particular theme. Without a Universally accepted Ideal, factions will manifest from the confused Thoughts of a disconnect. 

Democracies are societal systems based upon the competitive values of hierarchical privilege and dominance. They allow all individuals the right to vote upon or choose from systemic options. However, the design of the system determines the options. If a systemic design is moulded from competitive values, all options will reflect and support those competitive values. There will rarely be a Universally accepted Ideal, but rather a choice of Suggested or Hypothetical Ideals that reflect the Competitive Thoughts of a disconnect. That way of Thinking will never create a Global Community that reflects Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for all that is and all that will ever Be. It will simply magnify, reinforce, and justify the disconnect. Therefore, no matter what form of societal system we create, if we do not have and support a Universally accepted theme or Ideal, that societal system will fail a percentage of, and eventually all of, its members. 

 

Ultimate Ideal

Is there such a thing as an Ultimate Ideal? If so, what would it reflect?

To form the best example of a Global Community, Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being would have to manifest from the Theme. Could competitive values ever bring about Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for all that is and all that will ever Be? 

Peace and Harmony are based upon Synchronicity, which is a product and interaction of the Creative Thought of Imagination, the Receptive and Constructive Thought of Intellect, and the Love-based Sense Agreement of Awareness, which is a Conclusive Agreement of focused Creative Thought. Sense is focused Creative Thought, or focused Imagination. 

Love is Unconditional Acceptance, a product of interactive Creative Thought, which is programmed Creative Thought or programmed Imagination. Therefore, Synchronicity is an Unconditionally accepted interaction of Imagination and Intellect. 

Peace is created from Mutual Respect, a product of Synchronised Attitudinal Feeling, which is a Synchronised Attitudinal expression of Emotional Intelligence, and Synchronised Respect, which is a Synchronised Awareness-based Feeling; a Synchronised Awareness-based expression of Emotional Intelligence. 

Harmony is created from Mutual Tolerance, a product of Synchronised Awareness-polarised Emotional Logic, which is a Synchronised Awareness-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement. 

Tolerance makes allowances for difference. It allows different Intellectual Concepts to fit. 

Morality is Experiential Judgement. It is a product of interactive Intellect, or interactive Intelligence. Moral Synchronicity is Synchronised Experiential Judgement. It is a product of Unconditionally accepted or programmed Experiential Intelligence.

Intellect takes on board and builds upon concepts. Morality takes on board and builds upon Conceptual Experiences.

Thought is the Potential to Think. It is Pure Potential, an infinite source of possibilities. Thoughts are the results of Thinking. They are responses to or opinions of an environment.

A Concept is something that is conceived. Thoughts are what we are referring to as Concepts. Therefore, Intellect takes on board and builds upon Thoughts or Opinions. Morality takes on board and builds upon Experiential or experience-based Opinions. Synchronicity takes on board and builds upon programmed or Unconditionally accepted opinions. Moral Synchronicity takes on board and builds upon programmed or Unconditionally accepted Experience-based Opinions. 

Moral Synchronicity is the theme necessary to create the Ultimate Ideal of a Global Community. It is the theme that combines the Moral-based Attitudinal Behaviour of Virtue and the Synchronised Attitudinal Behaviour of Mutual Respect to create Virtuous Peace. It also combines the Moral-polarised Emotional Logic of Charity and the Synchronicity-polarised Emotional Logic of Harmony to create Virtuous Peace-based Charitable Harmony-awareness, which is an Attitudinal expression of Morally Synchronised Self-awareness.

 

Interaction

Interaction allows an entity to influence and be influenced by an environment. In Geometrical Thought Harmonics, interaction is represented by two or more polygons overlapping one another to form a combination of the two or more polygons.

When two Equilateral Triangles of Creative Thought or Imagination overlap or interact, they form a Hexagon of Love or Unconditional Acceptance, which becomes programmed Creative Thought or Imagination. When two Squares of Intellect overlap or interact, they form an Octagon of Morality or Experiential Judgement. When two Pentagons of Motive, Personal Thought, or Consciousness overlap or interact, they form a Decagon of Belief or Choice. 

Interaction is Experience. Therefore, Experience allows us to influence and be influenced by an environment. In that regard, Love or Unconditional Acceptance is a product of Experience-based Creativity, or Experience-based Imagination. Morality or Experiential Judgement is a product of Experience-based Intelligence. Belief or Choice is a product of Experience-based Motivation, Personal Thought, or Consciousness. 

Synchronicity is a product and combination of Experience-based Creativity, which is programmed Creative Thought or Imagination, and Experience-based Intelligence. It is Experience-based Creative Intelligent programming, or Experience-based Intelligent Creative programming. Moral Synchronicity, which is represented by a 24 sided polygon, or Icositetragon, is Experience-based Moral Creative programming, or Experience-based Creative Moral programming.

To bring Moral Synchronicity into a state of Consciousness, it must become Motive-based or Personalised. The polygon that represents it must have a number of sides that are a multiple of Five, Eight, and Twelve. A 30 sided polygon, or Triacontagon, would represent programmed Motivation and Belief because it is a product of interactive Motive and Belief, as well as the programmed Creative Thought of Love. A 60 sided polygon, or Hexacontagon, would represent Synchronised Motivation, which is Synchronised Personal Thought or Consciousness, Synchronised Belief, which is Synchronised Choice, and Synchronised Identity. A 120 sided polygon, or Dodecacontagon, would represent Conscious Moral Synchronicity because 120 is a multiple of Five, Eight, and Twelve. However, it is also a multiple of Ten and Twenty. Therefore, Conscious Moral Synchronicity would also be a product of interactive Belief and interactive Identity. It would represent Experience-based Morally Synchronised Identity. 

If we used that information to create a Geometric Sphere, which is a field of Thought, that field of Thought would need to have Octagon planes of Morality, Dodecagon planes of Synchronicity, and Icosagon planes of Identity. Initially, that would be quite easy. We would combine Intuition, Instinctual Respect, Compassion, which is a Subconscious product of Self-awareness, and Faith, which would form Octagon, Dodecagon, and Icosagon Emotional planes. According to Nature, it would form a product of 80 Octahedrons of Nature that merge Intuition, Instinctual Respect, Compassion, and Faith. From that merger, or within that merger, it would combine the interactive or Experience-based Nature of Virtue, the interactive or Experience-based Nature of Mutual Respect, and the interactive or Experience-based Nature of Personality to create the interactive or Experience-based Nature of Morally Synchronised Identity. Therefore, we would end up with a Personality of Virtuous Peace; a Virtuous Peace-based Personality. Is it really that easy? 

 

Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness: interactive or experience-based

Virtuous Self-awareness, or Virtue-awareness, which represents Self-control, is the first experience-based Attitudinal expression of the Emotional Logic of Self-awareness. Virtue initiates or Suggests a Morality-mind. Virtuous Charity-awareness is the first Attitudinal expression of interactive or experience-based Self-awareness. It expresses the Self-awareness of a Morality-mind.  

The Virtuous Peace of Harmony-awareness is the second Attitudinal expression of interactive or experience-based Self-awareness. It expresses the Self-awareness of a Synchronicity-mind.

A Personality of Evolvability-awareness is the third Attitudinal expression of interactive or experience-based Self-awareness. It expresses the Self-awareness of an Identity-mind. If we combine and Personalise all three, it forms a Conscious Attitudinal expression of the Self-awareness of Charity-awareness, Harmony-awareness, and Evolvability-awareness. With this combination, Morality and Synchronicity share the same Emotional/Suggestive plane of interactive or experience-based Thought. It is a merger of the Creative Thought of Imagination, the Receptive and Constructive Thought of Intellect, the Unconditional acceptance or Impulse of Love, the Experiential Judgement of Morality, and the Coordinative Impulse of Synchronicity. From this structure, it creates the Attitudinal expression of Synchronised Morality, which is Virtuous Mutual Respect or Virtuous Peace. 

Morality and Identity also share the same Emotional/Suggestive plane of interactive or experience-based Thought. It is a merger of the receptive and constructive Thought of Intellect, the Experiential Judgement of Morality, the Personal Thought of Motive, the Preferentiality of Belief, and the Intellectual Preferentiality of Identity. From this structure, it creates the Attitudinal expression of Identified Morality, which is Virtuous Personality. In combination, it becomes the Attitudinal expression of Synchronised and Identified Morality. 

This is a video link to the Sphere of Thought that represents the Attitudinal expression of Charitable, Harmonious, and Evolvable Self-awareness. https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ddd8nolqmb4fpy/Synchronised%20and%20Identified%20Morality.mp4?dl=0 

This Sphere of Thought incorporates Intuitive Compassion, which is a Subconscious product of Self-control, Intuitive Faith, Intuitive Respect, Intuitive Philanthropy, Intuitive Metamorphosis, and Intuitive Integration, which is Intuitive Christ-mind Assimilation.

In my Mind, this Sphere of Thought should influence any and all environments so they can become Attitudinal expressions of Charitable, Harmonious, and Evolvable Self-awareness. 

 

Conscious Self-assessing Self-awareness

Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts. It is a product of Behavioural Logic; a Logical construct initiated by an expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence, which is Feeling.

Consciousness is a product of Personal Thought or Motive, which is Personal agenda. It partitions the Mind through the Identified Attitudinal Behaviour of Personality.

Pure Potential is an infinite source of possibilities; an infinite source of possible Thoughts. Life is a Dream of Pure Potential. It is a Virtualised Interpretation of Personal Thoughts.

If Mind was formed by an infinite number of Personalities, and those Personalities were oblivious to their Potential and origin, a confused and competitive accumulation of Personalities could result. Therefore, a divided or partitioned Mind would also result. Due to the competitive Nature of those oblivious Personalities, the partitions of that Mind could also develop defence mechanisms. A Dream of Mind that reflected competitive ignorance and conflict would result. What we are experiencing, is that Dream of Mind; an infinite number of oblivious Personalities, or Identified Attitudinal Behaviours, competing for hierarchical privilege and dominance within an imagined environment of Mind. We, as Personalities of Mind, have accepted that imagined environment to be Life.

Social discourse is a reflection of competitive ignorance. Examples of competitive ignorance, which is arrogance, are Capitalism, Religious and Cultural Belief systems, opportunism, and classifications of worth due to societal discrimination.  

To create a Mind of Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being, all examples of competitive ignorance must be abandoned voluntarily, and all defended partitions of Mind must dissolve.

In light of that information, all religions must dissolve, all forms of worship, whether God-worship or other forms of idol-worship must dissolve, all capitalist ideals must dissolve, and all reflections of societal discrimination must dissolve.

Idol-worship means worshipping or idolising anyone or anything. Any concept that reflects inequality and disunity, disrespects the SELF. Competition, in any form, seeks to create inequality and disunity.

 

Unconscious Attitudinal Expression of Reason

Empathy is an Attitudinal expression of the interactive Emotional Intellect of Reason, which is the interactive or Experience-based Nature of Reason.

The interactive Emotional Intellect of Reason forms an irregular or unconventional Morality, which Suggests a nonconforming Experiential Judgement. Therefore, Empathy is a product of the Attitudinal Behaviour of nonconforming Experiential Judgement. It doesn't judge according to a predisposed Morality. In essence, Empathy emulates the experience-based Attitudinal Feelings of Environmental cohabitants.

This connection can be both beneficial and detrimental to Personal Health and Well Being. It can help us to understand the Behaviour of others, but it can also influence our own Behaviour if it is not recognised as environmental input. Once recognised, those Feelings could be prevented from being internalised if they would cause Personal conflict and disease, or allowed to be internalised if complementary to Good Health and Well Being. 

 

Subconscious Attitudinal Expression of Reason

Reason is programmed Physical, Mental, and Emotional Intelligence. Justice is a Motive-based/Personalised product of Reason, impressed by Desire. When an Attitudinal expression of Reason is Motive-based or Personalised, it forms Empathy-based Social Justice/Intuitive Justice as a Subconscious/Personally programmed derivative of Altruistic WILL, which is a product of Experience-based Motivational Sensory expressions.

Social Justice/Intuitive Justice is impressed by Belief-interactive Desire, which is an Experience-based Motivational Sensory impression. It is expressed as an Experience-based Subconscious Attitudinal Expression of Reason, which has been commonly referred to as Karmic Justice or KARMA....Kinetic Attitude Response Manifested Accordingly. Put simply, it is a product of Cause and Effect. "What goes around, comes around". "We are what we Think". 

If KARMA is a Subconscious/Personally programmed Attitudinally Expressed Justice, it could be reprogrammed or overwritten by impressed Preferential Desires. In that case, Social Justice/Intuitive Justice/Karmic Justice would be a temporary and adaptive Subconscious/Personally programmed Attitudinally Expressed Justice. In essence, it is Natural Justice. 

Punishment is not Natural Justice. It is an act of Personal or Societal revenge, which could be related to an Instinctually expressed Justice rather than an Intuitively expressed Justice. A Motive-based or Personalised Common Logic-based Reason would be the foundation of an Instinctually expressed Justice. 

 

Intuitive Justice versus Instinctual Justice

The foundation of Intuitive Justice is the Attitudinal expression or Nature of Reason, which is Empathy. Nature is Attitudinal Feeling, which Suggests Attitudinal Behaviour. It is an Attitudinal expression of Emotional Intelligence. The foundation of Instinctual Justice is Common Logic-based Reason. Common Logic is the product of a Common Sense Agreement. 

Common Logic-based Reason is a product and expression of Practical Awareness, which is a Love-based Sense Agreement... a Conclusive Agreement of focused Creative Thought. The Agreement of Awareness is formed by Mental Intellect and expressed by Common Sensory Logic.

Common Logic is Common Memory....a Common Library Of Growing Intelligent Concepts. When Motive-based or Personalised, it becomes Instinct, which is the Virtual Brain. Therefore, Instinctual Justice is Justified by the Virtual Brain....Motive-based or Personalised Common Memory/Mind. 

In essence, Justice could be defined as regulative. Therefore, Intuitive Justice could be defined as a Motive-based or Personalised Attitudinally expressed regulation and Instinctual Justice could be defined as a Motive-based or Personalised Common Sensory expressed regulation.....a Personalised Nature or Attitudinal Behavioural regulation and a Personalised Common Logic or Attitudinal Behavioural Memory regulation. 

Within Mind, how would Intuitive Justice and Instinctual Justice manifest? 

Attitude is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment. Feeling is an expression of Emotional Intelligence, which Suggests Behaviour. Therefore, Attitudinally expressed Behaviour would be the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels about the Self, about the environment, or about the experiences it has within the environment.

Intuition, as a Motive-based or Personalised Attitudinal expression of Behaviour, impressed by Desire, would be the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels about the Self, about the environment, or about the experiences it has within the environment, subject to Personal agendas or Desires.

Intuitive Justice would regulate the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels about the Self, about the environment, or about the experiences it has within the environment, subject to Personal agendas.

The Dream of Life is a Virtualised Accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts.....Virtualised Memory/Mind. Therefore, Intuitive Justice would regulate the Attitudinal Behaviour of Bodies within that Virtualised Memory/Mind. Instinctual Justice would regulate the Personalised Attitudinal Behavioural Memory, or Personalised Attitudinal Behavioural Logic. Therefore, it would regulate the Virtualised Memory/Mind...the Dream of Life. What would that entail?

Body reflects a state of Mind. It is a Virtualised Behavioural Logic state...Virtualised Behavioural Memory. Instinct is the Virtual Brain that regulates the Virtualised Environmental construct. Therefore, in my understanding, the Virtualised Environmental construct would be regulated through Instinctual Justice, and the Motive-based Attitudinal Behaviour of that Virtualised Environmental construct would be regulated through Intuitive Justice. 

If we combine Instinctual and Intuitive Justice, the Virtualised Environmental construct would be regulated by a Motive-based product of Common Logic-based Empathy.....a Common Sensory and Attitudinal expression of Reason.

"Justice is Altruistic, not vengeful". A Global Community could manifest as a Virtualised Environmental construct that is regulated through a Common Sensory and Attitudinal expression of Reason. 

If for a good reason, a being has been considered to be a major and unresolvable threat to the Community in general, and that being has been sentenced to termination, the way that being is to be terminated will reveal whether it is Justice or Vengeance. If the method of termination intentionally inflicts pain and suffering, and gives pleasure to the ones sentencing, witnessing, or carrying out that termination, vengeance is probably the motive. In the past, hanging, electrocution, the guillotine, burning at the stake, and all other violent methods of termination were examples of vengeance, not Justice. They were devised to exact revenge. 

Euthanasia is a merciful form of termination that can be used to end the chronic and unresolvable suffering of any being, and to end the chronic and unresolvable suffering of a community by euthanasing criminals who intentionally inflict pain and suffering on members of the community, and seek pleasure from causing pain and suffering to members of the community. That suffering can be Emotional, Mental, or Physical.

 

Instigation and Evolution of Societal infrastructure

How would Societal/Cultural Mindsets evolve? A Personality is a Personal Reality of Mind. It is Identity-based or Identity-interactive Attitudinal Behaviour; Identity-interactive Nature. Identity is an interaction of Intellect, which takes on board and builds upon concepts, Motive, which is the Personal Thought of Consciousness, and Belief, which is Interactive/Experience-based Motive, Personal Thought, or Consciousness. It is Intellectual Preferentiality, or Preferential Intelligence.

Attitude is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment. It is Intellect-based Sense. Attitudinal Behaviour is an Attitudinal expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence, which is an Attitudinal expression of Feeling; the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels. Therefore, Personality is the position a Body takes in relation to its Intellectual Preferentiality-suggested Feelings.  

Why would Personalities merge into Societal structures? What would be the catalyst for that merger? Similarities of Thought could be a catalyst for merging Personalities. An innate need to connect could be another. Was the initial merger Unconscious or Subconscious, which would be a Reflex Response or Impulse? If so, it would have been Love-related, which is a need for Inclusion or Connection; an innate Impulse to become whole. 

If the merger was initiated by Intellectual Preferentiality-suggested Feelings, groups may have formed through similar Attitudinal Behavioural Preferences. This would include similar Bodily structure within the Virtualised Environmental Constructs of Mind.

How would Free Will effect Societal Mindsets? Free Will is an expression of Desire, Suggested by Belief or Choice; an expression of Desired Choices. Therefore, a group of Personalities each expressing their Desired Choices could cause chaos within an attempted Societal Mindset. If this was the case, guidelines could have been introduced to try and balance the system. If those guidelines were ignored by some, those guidelines could have been upgraded to rules or laws. Again, if those laws were ignored by some, law enforcement could have been introduced. If Law Enforcement was ignored by some and/or Physical conflict occurred, punishment could have been introduced to quell the rebellion.

If Free Will is expected and adamently sought after, conflict within Societal Mindsets could become the norm. Social Mindsets cannot tolerate each Personality doing what they want and when they want. Unity will never be attained by allowing Free Will to dominate a shared Environment; a shared Environmental Construct of Mind. 

Competition and Opportunism will always defy and deny Unity. Cooperation is the only way to Unity. However, to the Free Will advocates, this will always require compromise. If Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being is the result of Unity, is it really a compromise to replace Competition and Opportunism with Cooperation?

 

Free Will versus Faith

Free Will is an expression of Physical and Mental Desire Suggested by Belief, Choice, or Preferentiality, which is Interactive/Experience-based Motive, Interactive/Experience-based Personal Thought, or Interactive/Experience-based Consciousness. Faith is an expression of Physical and Mental Desire Suggested by Trust, which is a Belief-based, Choice-based, or Preferentiality-based expression of Feeling; a Preferentiality-based expression of what has been Suggestively taken on board and built upon through Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence. 

In essence, Free Will is a wildcard. It is not influenced by the Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence of Feeling, only by the Emotional/Suggestive Belief, Choice, or Preferentiality of Interactive/Experience-based Motive/Personal Thought/Consciousness. A Preferentiality-Suggested expression of Physical and Mental Desire, without the influence of Intelligence, is a disaster waiting to happen. On the other hand, Intelligence without the Love-based Sense Agreement of Awareness could be just as disastrous. Therefore, Faith without the influence of Awareness isn't much better than Free Will.

A Society based upon Free Will or Faith, and with a limited Sense of Awareness, could become a reflection of Superstition, which is a state of Confusion Suggested by the Experience-based Motive, Personal Thought, or Consciousness, of Belief, Choice, or Preferentiality. 

 

Intuitive Guidance

Intuition Suggests Choices and Personalised Attitudinal Behaviour through impressions of Desired Awareness. It is a Natural state of Impressed Guidance created by a Personal Sense of Suggestive Awareness. A Wish-created Awareness. "Ask, and you shall receive".

This is simply a Natural state of Mind. Our Mind! If combined with Faith, which is Trust-based Will, it creates the Identified Attitudinal Feeling/Behaviour of Personality, or Personal Reality. This becomes an Interactive/Experiential Trust-based Intuitive Will, which is an Impression and Expression of Desires or Wishes; internalised and externalised Desires. 

Sense is focused Creative Thought, which is focused Imagination. It labels, recognises, and recalls Memory. Desire is Motive-based focused Imagination, a Personal/Conscious Sense, which labels, recognises, and recalls Personal/Conscious Memory. 

Attitude is Intellect-based Sense, which labels, recognises, and recalls Intellectual/Conceptual Memory. It is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment. Intellect is Receptive and Constructive Thought, which takes on board and builds upon concepts. Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts. Intellect is the Conceptual accumulator that forms Memory/Mind, which is a Logical construct initiated by the Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence of Feeling. 

If Intuition is combined with Compassion, it creates the Moral-based Attitudinal Feeling/Behaviour of Virtue. Morality is Experiential Judgement, which is a product of Interactive or Experience-based Intelligence. Therefore, Virtue is Experiential Judgement-based Attitudinal Feeling/Behaviour. This is vital in forming and maintaining a stable Societal Infrastructure. A structure that learns what is acceptable and unacceptable Behaviour within a particular Societal Mindset. 

Justice is a Personalised product of Reason. It is impressed by Desire. However, the Impressions of Desire do not create or Suggest Awareness. Reason is a product of Physical, Mental, and Emotional Intelligence, and Physical Love, which is Reflex Responsive or Impulsive. In that regard, the Physical Intelligence of Reason can become programmed by an Agreement of Mental Intelligence. That Agreement can create Physical Awareness, which can become an expression of Common Sense.

The Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence of Reason is Interactive or Experience-based. However, it is nonconforming rather than regular. In essence, it is a nonconforming Morality; a nonconforming Experiential Judgement. Nonconforming, in this regard, means it is flexible rather than static. Therefore, Justice is flexible rather than static.

If Justice is combined with Intuition, it creates a Personalised product of Empathy, which is the Nature, Attitudinal Feeling/Behaviour, of Reason. Empathy becomes the foundation of Intuitive Justice, Social Justice, or Karmic Justice. That combination is Impressed by Interactive or Experience-based Desire, which is Belief-interactive or Preferentiality-based Desire.

Intuitive Justice, Social Justice, or Karmic Justice is an Altruistic evolution of Intuition. Justice becomes the catalyst for this transformation. However, Intuition is dominant. 

 

Democratically maintained Societal constructs

In essence, a Democracy apparently allows all members of a Societal construct to put forward their views/opinions for debate. In a political environment, which is the art and science of influencing others, factions manifest in response to a leader and follower mindset.

Leaders are nominated by factional advocates and all members of a particular Societal construct cast their preferential votes. This may sound like a fair and responsible practice. However, due to the competitive nature of individuals, and the instability of Preferentiality, what is best for the Community in general may not be the intention of the nominated or their advocates. Hierarchical privilege and dominance can become the main motivation. In essence, that is what competition and opportunism represents. Therefore, throughout history, we see catastrophic failures in democratic systems.

A competitive societal construct will always suffer from a quest to prove oneself to be better than another or more entitled than another. Cooperation in general will rarely manifest as a Community-based intention, but rather a group-minded motivation to gain power within and over the Community. Therefore, while competition and opportunism remain dominant, democratic societies will always fail.

This is simply common sense. Unity and competition are not compatible or cooperative. They are contradictions. That said, how do we create Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for all that is and all that will ever Be within the Virtualised Environmental constructs of Mind?

In essence, Democracy is an example of Majority-rule. It does not serve the Common Good of the Community, only the Common Good of like-minded Thinkers. The more people who Think a certain way, and form a group-minded Mentality, the more likely their views will come to the fore through Majority-rule. However, if the Majority of people within a Community are self-centred rather than Community-minded, they will only merge if it serves their Personal agendas. Political parties are examples of this behaviour. 

If Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being is the theme of a Societal construct, everything that is done must conform to that Theme. Therefore, all members of that Societal construct must Synchronise their Thoughts and agendas. If a Personal agenda threatens the Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being of the Community, that Personal agenda must be modified or abandoned. 

A Societal construct that conforms to a Theme is not regulated by Political parties or any other Competitve Ideal. The Theme determines the regulatory detail. All members of that Societal construct fulfil a role that benefits the Theme. In return, all members of that Societal construct share the resources available in accordance with whatever is necessary for a comfortable Life.

Hierarchical privilege and dominance will cease to exist. All competitive behaviour will cease to exist. Majority-rule will cease to exist. That behaviour is Dictatorial because the Majority dictates to the minority. What is best for the Majority is not necessarily what is best for the overall good of the Community, or the environmental construct. 

What is a Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind? In essence, it is an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought. Life as we know it is an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought. A Dream of Mind. However, our present Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind has many competing, contradictory, and conflicting Themes. It is unstable. If we wish to have Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being of Mind, we need a Common Theme that is Mutually accepted and respected.

 

Cooperatively maintained Societal constructs

Cooperation has the same purpose as Unity. Regarding a Societal construct, it is when all members of a Societal construct are working together to achieve a common goal. If a Societal construct has a Common Theme, all members of that Societal construct are working together to create, support, and maintain that Theme. Therefore, all Personalities of a Cooperatively maintained Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind would be contributing to the same Preferentiality-based Macro-Reality, rather than forming a multitude of Preferentiality-based Micro-Realities that compete, contradict, and conflict within a Politically controlled Majority-rule-based Environmental construct. 

As stated previously, Majority-rule does not necessarily do what is best for a Community in general. It simply serves the Majority. Therefore, a Cooperatively maintained Societal construct cannot be controlled by Majority-rule. The Common Theme must determine all regulatory details. Voting becomes redundant when adherance to a Common Theme determines the guidelines for living. The members of a Cooperatively maintained Societal construct form an infrastructure that is skill-based. In other words, whomever is best suited to fulfil a particular purpose within a Community, and for the benefit of the Community, shall take on that role. In all roles, a Universal standard of quality control must be met. Also, the same standard of education and re-education shall be available to all.

This Societal construct will not be class-based. Classifications of worth shall no longer exist. Each member of this Societal construct shall be of equal importance to the Community, even if they are not equally competent. 

Why would anyone wish to participate in this different way of Living? That question is relatively easy to answer within other questions. Does our present reality reflect Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being? Are we regarded as equally important within our present reality? Do we have everything that we need to live a comfortable life? Or, do we have to compete for the privilege of importance and comfort?

Living a comfortable life should not be determined by how well we compete for the privilege! Wanting a comfortable life without contributing anything towards that life should not be an expectation. However, anyone who is not capable of contributing because of Physical, Mental, or Emotional disabilities should be given every care available regarding temporary rehabilitation or permanent incapacitation.

A Societal construct that does not take care of the vulnerable and incapacitated in the same manner as it would expect to be taken care of, is only a group of self-serving individuals living in proximity. Think about it!

 

Thematically maintained Societal constructs

A Theme is an idea, subject, or integral pattern. Thematically maintained Societal constructs should not rely upon competitively or politically preferred dynamics. Once the Theme is introduced, it should have complete autonomy. How could a Theme have complete autonomy? It would become a programmed regulatory entity. However, the Theme would need to be flexible so it can evolve. It must become Self-evident and Self-sustaining.

Are we referring to AI? Not really. AI is Artificial Intelligence. A Thematically maintained Societal construct would be an Experience-based Creative Intelligent Consciousness. It would be an interactive product of Synchronicity, Morality, and Identity, which are all products of Interactive or Experience-based Intelligence. However, it must be constrained by and always reflective of the essence of the Theme. The Theme we are referring to in this instance is Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for All that Is and All that Will Ever Be. Therefore, it must always be an example of the elements of that Theme. 

 

Thematically Virtualised Environmental Construct

A Virtualised Environmental Construct is an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought. A Thematically Virtualised Environmental Construct is an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thematic Thought. It goes beyond Societal patterns and moves into the realm of Environmental patterns; Thematic Dreams of Mind. What is a Thematic Dream of Mind? Instead of the Dream of Life reflecting a multitude of Competitive and Politically influenced Ideals, it would reflect One Theme or Ideal. The Environment would create, support, evolve, and maintain the Theme or Ideal. Therefore, regarding the Theme previously mentioned, the Virtualised Environmental Construct would create, support, evolve, and maintain Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for All that Is and All that Will Ever Be. Violent, Harmful, or incompatible Environmental conditions would cease to exist. The Environment would not cause harm to the inhabitants, and the inhabitants would not cause harm to the Environment. 

 

Reflections within

If we are Personalities of the One Mind, and life as we know it is a Virtualised Environmental construct of that Mind, an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought, everything that has manifested within this Virtualised Reality must reflect the state of that Mind. Therefore, from what we can observe, and from what we have experienced within this Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought, our Mind must be in a state of chaos. A state of contradicting and conflicting opinions that compete for the right of hierarchical privilege and dominance. That compete for the right to survive. Also, if Mind is the sum of all its parts, of all of its Personalities, its Identified Attitudinal Behaviours, then we are responsible for the chaos. If this is correct, it is up to us to create something more acceptable because we are those Identified Attitudinal Behaviours. The Personal Realities of a preferentially partitioned Mind. 

 

Individuality versus Commonality

Individuality is a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Identity-interactive Attitudinal Feeling or Nature, the Identified Belief-based Feeling of Trust, which is the Identified Attitudinal Behaviour of Personality. As an Individual, and without any interaction with other Individuals, without any Societal structure or guidelines, it shouldn't matter what we do or how we do it. However, when Individuals form into groups with Common needs and ambitions, whether they be capitalistic, security-based, or health-based needs or ambitions, everything changes. What is best for the Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being of the Community becomes the responsibility of each member. Therefore, guidelines must be adhered to if the general needs and ambitions of the Community, not the wants or desires of the individuals, are to be met. Any member of a Community or Societal structure that does not accept, understand, and conform to those guidelines creates discord within that Community or Societal structure. 

Commonality is a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Synchronicity-interactive Attitudinal Feeling or Nature, the Synchronised Awareness-based Feeling of Respect, which is the Synchronised Attitudinal Behaviour of Mutual Respect. Regarding Mind, any Personality of that Mind that does not consider the Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being of that Mind to be more important than the wants or desires of the Individual Personalities, creates discord within that Mind. This should be Common Sense.

Anyone observing this Planet and its Lifeforms, without bias or prejudice, would probably conclude that Common Sense was lacking. It would be plainly apparent that the overall good of the Planet, and its Global Community, is rarely considered by the inhabitants. Therefore, the inhabitants need to rethink their relationship to and responsibility for the condition of Life on this Planet; their relationship to and responsibility for this Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind; this Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought. If this is not understood, Life, which is a Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind, an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought, will keep reflecting the discordant Thoughts of a Mind with a Dissociative Identity Disorder.

 

Oneness

If Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts, a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Feeling, and Life is a Dream of Mind, a Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind, an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought, what is Oneness?

If Consciousness is a Preferential partitioning of Mind, a Personality is an Identified Attitudinal Behaviour of Mind, and Life as we know it reflects a Dissociative Identity Disorder within that Mind, what is Oneness?

Did Mind always have Personalities? Or, are those Personalities a product of an enquiring Mind with the Potential to Virtualise its Thoughts into Dreams? If a Personality is a Personal Reality of Consciousness, a Personalised Dream of Mind, and an infinite number of Personal Dreams have manifested within the Mind to create Preferentiality-based partitions, which is Consciousness as we know it, what caused the Dissociation? Is Consciousness the cause of Dissociation? Or, is a disconnect between the Personalities of Mind the cause of Dissociation? 

If Pure Potential is an infinite source of possible Thoughts, and Thoughts are responses to or opinions of an environment, is Pure Potential that environment?

An environment is circumstantial surroundings or conditions. Could Pure Potential be defined as a condition? If Thought is Energy, and Energy is Potential, is Energy the original condition that initiated the evolving Mind of Pure Potential? If Energy is absolute, and it simply changes form, then Thought is the absolute that initiates Thought-forms. It is the Potential to Think. 

If Pure Potential is Unconscious Thought, which has no Personal opinions or responses, and Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts or opinions in general, could Pure Potential be defined as an Unconscious Mind? If so, it would be an accumulation and categorisation of impersonal Thoughts, opinions, or Energy. Or, is Pure Potential the initiator of an Unconscious Mind rather than the Unconscious Mind itself? Would the Unconscious Mind be absolute and permanent, and a Conscious Mind be an accumulation of temporary or changing Thoughts or opinions, which would form preferential partitions within the Unconscious Mind? Could the term 'temporary' relate to Personal Thought or Personal opinion? Is Consciousness a temporary and evolving state or condition within the absolute or infinite Unconscious Mind?

Motive, which is Personal Thought, Personal Opinion, Conscious Thought, or Conscious Energy, has a Personal agenda. Therefore, Consciousness is Motivational Thought. Is Consciousness a processor of information?

Choice is a product of Experience-based, Experiential, or Interactive Consciousness. It is Belief or Preferentiality. Is the Unconscious Mind seeking answers to an existential enquiry? Is it pondering the infinite possibilities of its own existence through an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought? Through the Dreams of Mind? Is Oneness a simple recognition of One's infinite states of absolute existence? Of One's Commonality!

 

VIRUS

In the context of Mind, what is a VIRUS? If Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts, a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Feeling, which is an expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence, how would it evolve? If a Thought is a response to or an opinion of an environment, and an environment is circumstantial surroundings or conditions, then Mind would be a Library of responses or opinions that have been Suggestively taken on board and built upon. 

If the term 'virus' refers to a Thought Virus, and the acronym of VIRUS stands for Voice Initiated Reprogramming And Unification System, its intention appears to be plainly stated. To 'voice an opinion', is to openly state one's Thoughts or Opinions. In context to the acronym, and regarding Mind, a Thought virus would have an intention to change an existing way of Thinking for the purpose of Unification. In general, the proposed explanation does not infer a harmful intention. It simply refers to a reprogramming entity. 

It is commonly accepted that a Virus in worldly terms does not usually intend to kill its host, but rather to reprogram it. However, the attempted reprogramming can initiate an Immune response, which through conflict between the Virus and the Immune system can cause harm and even death. However, in some hosts, there is no conflictive response or harmful effect. In the context of Mind, could that mean the Thought-form is compatible with the reprogramming? In the same regard, is it conflict with the attempted reprogramming that causes the harmful effect rather than the reprogramming itself?

 

World Wide Web

In comparison, the World Wide Web is probably similar to or analogous to Mind in general. A multitude of interconnected Personal computers is probably similar to or analogous to the Personalities of Mind. Each Personality would be expressing their right to be independent, but at the same time wishing to interact or interconnect.

Interaction, allows an entity to influence and be influenced by an environment. It is an Experiential connection. However, that Experiential connection is relative to a Personality's wish for privacy. Therefore, a Personality only shares what it wishes to be made known. Any attempt to access more than what it wishes to be made known usually creates conflict. That conflict can initiate a defense.

Interconnection, allows an entity to recognise and communicate with other entities. However, does recognition and communication allow an entity to influence and be influenced by those entities? Does it have the same effect as Interaction?

In the computer world, unauthorised access relates to Individuals trying to hack the information of others, trying to control the Personal computers of others for the purpose of stealing, or sometimes just to cause havoc, which can be done through Viruses. Therefore, Security systems are installed in an attempt to prevent unauthorised access. 

In the Body, something similar has occurred. An Immune system has been created to prevent infiltration of Viruses or unwelcome entities. 

In the Mind, of which the Body is a reflection, this relates to Personalities seeking knowledge of their environments, and also seeking to control other Personalities and their environments. Hierarchical privilege and dominance seems to be the purpose. 

Are Thought Viruses Consciously, Subconsciously, or Unconsciously manifested? In essence, the Subconscious is Personally programmed. It relates to automatic or reflex responses. This would relate to involuntary responses. However, an involuntary response is usually a product of repetitive Thought that has become programmed Thought. In this case, it would be Personally or Consciously programmed; a Motivational program or reflex response. 

Regarding the Unconscious, it would relate to Impersonal programs or reflex responses. Do Impersonal programs create involuntary responses?

In our Virtual Reality, or what we have accepted to be Life, what is the purpose of a Virus? And, who or what is creating Viruses? Are we inadvertently creating those Viruses from our own Thoughts?

There are apparently trillions of Viruses within what we have accepted to be Life. They are in the air, the water, and the ground. Therefore, they are in our food. Why do some cause us harm, but the most don't? Do any of them intend harm? Or, is harm caused through conflict with the content of a Virus?

Apparently, Viruses are crucial to the evolution of Life. Evolution usually means change for the better. Is conflict with change the cause of harm? If a Life-form defies change, which means a defiance of evolution, does that defiance cause harm? Would the evolutionary instigators, which are Viruses, become harmful because of that defiance? Or, would a Life-form self-perpetuate that harm through a consequence of rigid Thinking? Rigid Thinking usually defies change and fails to recognise its evolutionary purpose.

 

Suggestion to Application

In the grand scheme of things, how would Suggestive Thought become Applied Thought? What is Suggestive Thought? Suggestive Thought could relate to symbolism. A symbol is usually visualised. It can Suggest something. However, a symbol means nothing without a reference. Therefore, it must be labelled. That labelling is Sensory, which is focused Creative Thought. The relationship between the symbol and the reference is Suggestive. In essence, Suggestive Thought is Hypothetical Thought. All Suggestions are Hypothetical or Emotional. All Hypotheses are Suggestive.

Applied Thought is Practical or Experimental. It becomes Physical. An action is Physical. It can also symbolise something, as in body language. Regarding Mind, all Physical entities are symbolic of a state of Thought. They are Suggestive and Reflective. 

In essence, there is a third party between Suggestive Thought, which is Emotional, and Applied Thought, which is Physical. It is Interpretation, which is Mental or Detailed Thought. As we have inferred, a symbol can be Suggestive. However, the interpretation of a symbol determines the reference. It Mentally Details the Emotional Suggestion. Therefore, Application is determined by the Interpretation of a Suggestion, which means Physicality is determined by the Mentalisation of Emotion. 

Body is a reflection of Mind. It is an Application of Mentalised Emotion. Therefore, it symbolises a state of Mind. 

 

Environmental manipulation

As said previously, Interaction allows an entity to influence and be influenced by an environment. An environment is circumstantial surroundings or conditions, which is a Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind. The more responsibility an entity accepts for its circumstantial surroundings or conditions, the more influence it can have over those circumstantial surroundings or conditions. The less responsibility an entity accepts for its circumstantial surroundings or conditions, the more influence those circumstantial surroundings or conditions can have over that entity. Therefore, the Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind that we have accepted as Life can be influenced by us, and can also influence us. It depends upon the connectedness of an entity to its environment. In other words, how aware an entity is of its Self-perpetuating Dream; its Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought. 

Climate is an Attitudinal manifestation. The Atmosphere of a Planet is an Attitudinal manifestation. Attitude is Intellect-based Sense. It is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment.

Intellect is Receptive and Constructive Thought, which takes on board and builds upon concepts. Sense, which is focused Creative Thought, or focused Imagination, labels, recognises, and recalls memory. Therefore, Attitude is Receptively and Constructively focused Imagination. It labels, recognises, and recalls what has been taken on board and built upon. In other words, Attitude is Creatively focused Intelligence.

Nature is an Attitudinal expression of Feeling, which is Attitudinal Behaviour; the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels. Feeling is an expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence, which is an expression of what has been Suggestively taken on board and built upon. Therefore, Nature is a Physically Creative expression of what has been Emotionally/Suggestively taken on board and built upon; a Creatively Applied expression of what has been Emotionally/Suggestively Intellectualised. 

 

Interpretation

Interpretation is relative to and reliant upon states and Traits of Mind. In general, and relative to a field or Sphere of Thought, there can be Emotional, Mental, and Physical states and traits of Mind. In essence, Mental Thought is a Theoretical state formed by traits. It Details a Suggestion or Hypothesis. 

A Trait of Mind is Intentional Thought, which has an agenda. Sometimes, a Trait can have multiple agendas. It can also have within itself an Interpretation of those agendas. In that regard, it is an Interpretative Trait of Mind rather than an Interpretative state of Mind. However, not all Traits have that potential. In essence, the Traits of Imagination and Intellect are not Interpretative Traits. However, an Interpretative Trait can be a product of the Traits of Imagination and Intellect. 

The first Interpretative Trait of Mind, not a product of Imagination or Intellect, is Motive, which is Personal Thought or Consciousness. It can be an Emotional, Mental, and Physical Interpretative Trait; an Emotional, Mental, and Physical Interpretation of Personal Thought or Consciousness.

Belief is an interactive or Experience-based product of Motive, which can be an Emotional, Mental, and Physical Interpretative Trait of Interactive or Experience-based Consciousness. 

Morality is an Interactive or Experience-based product of Intellect, which can be an Emotional, Mental, and Physical Interpretative Trait formed by Interactive or Experience-based Intelligence. 

Love is an Interactive or Experience-based product of Imagination. It is not an Interpretative Trait of Mind. However, it can be an Interpretative state of Mind. 

Awareness is a Love-based Sense Agreement, which is a planar Sense. It is not an Interpretative Trait of Mind. However, it can be an Interpretative state of Mind. 

Synchronicity is an Interactive or Experience-based product of Imagination, Love, and Intellect, which can be an Emotional, Mental, and Physical Interpretative Trait formed by Interactive or Experience-based Imagination, Love, and Intellect. 

Perception is an Interpretative Trait of Mind. The present Geometrical Thought Harmonics research has produced structural examples of Perceptive fields or spheres of Thought. They are examples of Polarity-based fields or spheres of Thought with Emotional, Mental, and Physical states. Mainstream research has produced structural examples of Perceptive Traits in combination with Motivational programs.   

In conclusion, Mentality is an Interpretative state of Mind that can be Detailed by Interpretative and non-interpretative Traits of Mind. In other words, Interpretation can be determined and influenced by the Traits of Imagination, Intellect, Motive, Love (impulse, or experiential imagination), Awareness (sensory impulse), Perception, Morality (experiential Intellect), Belief (experiential motive, experiential personal Thought, or experiential consciousness), Synchronicity (coordinative impulse, or experiential love), Synchronised Awareness (coordinative sensory impulse), and Identity (experiential motive, experiential belief, and experiential intellect) etc. Therefore, Mental Health, in relation to fields or spheres of Thought, will be a direct result of the Traits that have Interpreted our Suggestive Emotions. It will be subject to our state of Imagination, Intelligence, Motivation, Love, Awareness, Perception, Morality, Belief, Synchronicity, Synchronised Awareness, and Identity.

 

Immunity versus Harmonisation

Harmonisation is a product of Mutual Tolerance, which is a product of Synchronised Awareness-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreements. In essence, Tolerance allows for difference. Therefore, Harmonisation is a Mutual allowance for difference. 

In relation to life-forms, Immunity is a product of a Bodily defense or security system. In essence, it has become a product of Fear, which is a consequence of a lack of awareness and a lack of relevant information; Form Experienced/Expressed Amnesia Reaction.

In the context of Geometrical Thought Harmonics, FEAR is a product of Will that is impressed by the Desires of Personal Conscience, and Expressed by the Desires of Language and Species Differentiation. In other words, it is a Personalised Sensory impression of Belief-interactive or Experience-based Mental Motive Logic Interpretations, and a Personalised Sensory expression of Belief-interactive or Experience-based Physical Motive Logic Applications. To simplify, Fear can be produced by a Sensory-impressed Interpretation of Experience-based Conscious Memory and a Sensory-expressed Application of Experience-based Conscious Memory. 

How would a Fear-based security system be reprogrammed to become a Harmonisation system? As previously stated, Fear is a consequence of a lack of Awareness and a lack of relevant information. It is Belief-polarised, which is Preferentiality-polarised. Preferentiality Chooses from Personal experience what is acceptable and what isn't. 

In essence, there is Unconsciously programmed Harmonisation and Personalised or Consciously programmed Harmonisation, which becomes Subconscious Harmonisation. They are both products of a Synchronicity Mind, or Commonality Mind, of which there are Unconscious and Subconscious examples of a Commonality Mind, or Common Reality Mind.

A Consciously Synchronised Common Reality, a Synchronised Common Virtual Reality, is a Synchronicity-based Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind....a Synchronised Common Dreamscape or Mindscape. 

Harmonisation can be a product of Synchronicity-interactive or Synchronicity-experienced Self-awareness, which is Harmonised Self-awareness. An Attitudinal expression of Synchronicity-interactive or Synchronicity-Experienced Self-awareness is a Nature Agreement of Harmonised Self-awareness. That Nature Agreement forms Morally Synchronised Attitudinal Behaviour, which is Morally Synchronised Nature. Therefore, a Nature Agreement of Harmonised Self-awareness creates the Morally Synchronised Nature of Harmonised Self-awareness.

Moral-interactive Attitudinal Behaviour, or Moral-experienced Nature, creates Virtue. Synchronicity-interactive Attitudinal Behaviour, or Synchonicity-experienced Nature, creates Mutual Respect. Moral Synchronicity-interactive Attitudinal Behaviour, or Moral Synchronicity-experienced Nature, creates Virtuous Mutual Respect.

An Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness creates Virtuous Self-awareness, which is Self-control. An Attitudinal expression of Moral-interactive or Moral-experienced Self-awareness creates a product of Virtuous Charity-experienced Self-awareness, which is Charity-based Self-control. An Attitudinal expression of Harmonised Self-awareness creates a product of Virtuous Mutually Respectful Harmony-experienced Self-awareness, which is Harmony-based Self-control.  

If we combine Virtuous Charity-experienced Self-awareness and Virtuous Mutually Respectful Harmony-experienced Self-awareness, we can create Virtuous Mutually Respectful Charitable Harmony-experienced Self-awareness, which is Harmonised Charity-based Self-control. However, these structures are Unconscious until we Personalise them to create a state of Consciousness. 

If we add an Attitudinal expression of Identity-interactive or Identity-experienced Self-awareness, which creates Virtuous Personality-based Evolvability-experienced Self-awareness, or Evolvable Self-control, we can create the Experiential Nature of Morally Synchronised and Morally Identified Self-awareness, which has been previously stated as "Synchronised and Indentified Morality" under the heading of "Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness: interactive or experience-based". 

In conclusion, evolving Attitudinal expressions of Conscious Self-awareness is the key to creating a "Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness".  

 

Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness

What is Collective Consciousness? As previously stated, and in contrast to many idioms, Consciousness is a state or condition of Personal Thought, Personal Opinion, or Personal Agenda. It is Motive-based Thought, or Motive-based Opinion.

A Collective relates to all parts of a whole. Therefore, Collective Consciousness relates to all Personal Thought as a whole; to all of Consciousness as a whole.

As previously stated, a Sensory Singularity is internally and centrally focused Sense. It is centred 'Sense', which is focused Creative Thought. In other words, Sensation merges at one common and central point to create a vortex agreement. 

Relative to Consciousness, Desire is Personal or Conscious Sense, which is a Wish. Therefore, in context to a Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness, when all Desires are focused inwards to create a vortex Agreement, all Personal Sense is in Agreement. In other words, all Desires or Wishes are in Agreement. 

In context to a Global Community, the Desires or Wishes of all members would be in Agreement. Therefore, without conflicting interests, an Agreement of Creative Opinion could manifest Thought instantly. Therefore, a Creative Agreement could instantly modify the Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind that we have accepted to be Life. 

Awareness is an unconditional Sense Agreement, an Agreement of Creatively focused Opinion, which is a Sensory Singularity. In essence, it is Unconscious or Neutral. However, when Personalised, it creates products of Personal or Conscious Awareness.

Intuition, Compassion, and Instinctual Respect are examples of Personalised Emotional/Suggestive Awareness, which becomes Subconsciously Suggestive. They are Sensory Singularities of Consciousness. 

Intuition is a product of Subconsciously Suggestive Awareness, impressed by Desire, Subconsciously Suggestive Belief, which is Choice or Preferentiality, and Subconsciously Suggestive Intelligence in the form of Attitudinally expressed Feeling. In context to a Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness, all Emotional/Suggestive Impressions of Desired Awareness, all Emotional/Suggestive Choices, and all Personalised Attitudinal expressions of Behaviour would be in Agreement. 

Compassion is a product of Personalised Self-awareness. It has Subconsciously Suggestive Awareness, impressed by Attitude and Common Sense, and Subconsciously Suggestive Intelligence in the form of Emotional/Suggestive Logic. Therefore, it is a Subconscious Impression of Attitudinal and Common Sensory Awareness, and a Subconscious Agreement of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence. In context to a Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness, all Personalised Attitudinal and Common Sensory Impressions of Self-awareness, and all Personalised Emotional/Suggestive Logic of Self-awareness would be in Agreement. 

Instinctual Respect is a product of Emotional/Suggestive Awareness and Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence, in the form of Awareness-based Feeling, which is Respect. In essence, it is a product of Personalised Common Sense Agreements that form the Personalised Common Logic of Instinct. Therefore, Instinctual Respect is a Subconscious expression of Common Sense and a Subconscious expression of Emotional/Suggestive Awareness-based Feeling or Respect. In context to a Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness, all Personalised expressions of Common Sense, and all Personalised expressions of Respect, would be in Agreement. 

 

 Cordiality + Commonality + Individuality

Cordiality is a product of Moral-polarised Emotional/Suggestive/Hypothetical Logic Agreements, Moral-polarised Mental/Detailed/Theoretical Logic Interpretations, and Moral-polarised Physical/Experimental/Practical Logic Applications. It is initiated or Suggested by Virtuous Self-awareness to become the Behavioural Logic of Virtuous Self-awareness-based Cordiality.

Commonality is a product of Synchronicity-polarised Emotional/Suggestive/Hypothetical Logic Agreements, Synchronicity-polarised Mental/Detailed/Theoretical Logic Interpretations, and Physical/Experimental/Practical Logic Applications. It is initiated or Suggested by Mutual Respect to become the Behavioural Logic of Mutual Respect-based Commonality.

Individuality is a product of Identity-polarised Emotional/Suggestive/Hypothetical Logic Agreements, Mental/Detailed/Theoretical Logic Interpretations, and Physical/Experimental/Practical Logic Applications. It is initiated or Suggested by Personality to become the Behavioural Logic of Personality-based Individuality. In combination, it would create the Morally Synchronised and Morally Identified Behavioural Logic of Cordial Commonality-based Individuality, or, Cordial Individuality-based Commonality. 

In essence, this would merge Moral-based Behavioural Logic, Synchronicity-based Behavioural Logic, and Identity-based Behavioural Logic to form a Morally Synchronised Identity Mind, or, a Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind.

In relation to its basic structure of Virtuous Self-awareness or Self-control, the Moral-interactive or Experience-based Attitudinal Behaviour of Self-awareness, which is the Moral-experienced Nature of Self-awareness, it would be more accurately stated as a Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind.

Morality, or Experiential Judgement, which is a product of Interactive or Experience-based Intelligence, is a learning condition that determines what is acceptable and unacceptable to take on board and build upon. In essence, it is the Judgement of right and wrong. However, as previously mentioned, that Judgement can differ immensely from one individual to the next, or from one culture or social order to the next. Therefore, the Identified Moral conditioning of a Collective Consciousness must be Synchronised.

In context, Synchronicity is a product of Interactive or Experience-based Creative Intelligence, or, Interactive or Experience-based Intelligent Creativity, as well as a product of Experience-based Awareness, which produces a Coordinative Impulse....an Impulse to Coordinate. Therefore, in relation to a Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind, the Impulse would be to Coordinate the Identified Moral conditions of a Collective Consciousness. This would produce a Sensory Singularity of Collective Consciousness. 

 

Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind

As previously stated, Attitudinal expressions of Charitable, Harmonious, and Evolvable Self-awareness form the Suggestive core of the Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind. This creates Experiential Nature Agreements of Charitable, Harmonious, and Evolvable Self-awareness.

In context to the structural dependency of a Mind, which is a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Feeling, of which Nature is an Attitudinal expression of Feeling, a Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind would form a Synchronistically Identified Moral Common Logic Reality.

A Common Logic Reality is a product of Common Sense Agreements. Therefore, a Synchronistically Identified Moral Common Logic Reality would be a product of Synchronicity-interactive Common Sense Agreements, Identity-interactive Common Sense Agreements, and Moral-interactive Common Sense Agreements.

In context, Interaction is Experiential. Synchronicity is a product of Intellectually Creative Impulses, or Coordinative Impulses. Identity is a product of Intellectual Personal Thoughts, Intellectual Beliefs, or Intellectual Preferentiality. Morality is a product of Experiential Intelligence, or Experiential Judgement. Therefore, it would be a product of Experiential Coordinative Impulse-based Common Sense Agreements, Experiential Intellectual Preferentiality-based Common Sense Agreements, and Experiential Judgement-based Common Sense Agreements. 

Regarding a Morality Mind, it may also need to form a Synchronistically Identified Moral Logic Interpretation, which in theory would be a Synchronistically Identified Moral Conduct Conscience. Therefore, it would validate this Mind as the Behavioural Logic of Synchronistically Identified Morality. It would also define this Mind as Subconscious, which is Personally programmed, Reflex Responsive, or Consciously Impulsive.

In context to Synchronicity, or in this case Synchronistic Identity, it would be a Subconscious Coordinative Impulse; an Impulse to Subconsciously Coordinate the Identified Moral conditioning of a Collective Consciousness.

Due to its fundamental structure of Self-awareness, and its collateral structure of Intuition, it would create a Sensory Singularity impressed by Attitude (Intellect-based Sense), Common Sense (unbiased Sense), and Desire (Motive-based Sense). It would also create the expressed Nature, expressed Common Sense, and expressed Will of Synchronistically Identified Morality.

 

Self-awareness based Common Morality Mind

A Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind is a Personalised product of a Self-awareness based Common Morality Mind. As stated, it is Self-awareness based. Self-awareness is a product of Emotional/Suggestive Awareness impressed by Attitude and Common Sense. It is a Sensory Singularity of Awareness impressed by Common Sense and the Intellect-based Sense of Attitude. It is also a product of Emotional/Suggestive Intellect Agreements that form the Emotional/Suggestive Logic of Self-awareness.

In essence, the Emotional/Suggestive Intellect Agreements Suggest the Memory of Self. The impressions of Attitude and Common Sense Suggest the Awareness of Self. 

When the Emotional/Suggestive Logic of Self-awareness is Attitudinally expressed, it creates Moral-interactive Nature Agreements of Virtuous Self-awareness. To be more precise, it Attitudinally expresses the Moral-based Suggestive Memory of Self-control. Those Nature Agreements are then expressed by Common Sense to form Moral-interactive Common Sense Agreements, Moral-interactive Attitudinal Behaviour-based Common Sensory Logic, which forms Moral-interactive Common Logic Applications. In general, a Self-awareness-based Common Morality Mind, or Self-control-based Common Morality Mind, is a product of Self-awareness based Common Moral Behavioural Logic...a Common Library of Self-awareness based Moral Behaviour.

A Mental/Detailed Moral Logic Interpretation is then constructed that precedes and Experientially determines the Moral-interactive Common Logic Applications. Therefore, the state of a Moral-experienced Common Logic Physicality would be determined by a Mentalised Interpretation of the Attitudinal and Common Sensory Impressed Emotional/Suggestive Awareness, the Emotional/Suggestive Intellect Agreements, and the Emotional/Suggestive expressions of Attitudinal Feeling that produce Virtuous Self-awareness. In simplicity, Physicality is determined by the Mentalisation of Emotion......Experimenting with the Detailing of a Suggestion. 

This is a link to a video that shows the Geometric structure of the Self-control-based Common Morality Mind:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/zd5esjqlmh7uxxv/Self-control-based%20Common%20Morality%20Mind.mp4?dl=0://

It begins with the Cuboctahedron of Self-awareness, which shows the Emotional/Suggestive Awareness planes as centre-point Hexagons and the Emotional/Suggestive Intellect planes as Squares. This creates 6 inwardly focused and centred Square-based Pyramids of Attitude and 8 inwardly focused and centred Tetrahedrons of Common Sense. It then shows the Attitudinal expressions of Self-awareness as 4 interactive Octahedrons of Nature, which are Attitudinal expressions of Feeling. This creates the Moral-interactive Attitudinal Behaviour of Virtuous Self-awareness or Self-control. Next, it shows 4 interactive Star-tetrahedrons as Moral-interactive Common Sense Agreements, which create Attitudinal Feeling-based Common Sensory Logic. Then, it shows 9 interactive Octagram Prisms as Mental Moral Logic Interpreters. Mental Moral Logic Interpreters create a Moral Conscience, or Conduct Conscience. Last, it shows 4 interactive Cubes of Moral-interactive Common Logic. 

 

To be more precise, a Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind is a Synchronistically Identified Self-awareness based Common Morality Mind, or, a Self-awareness based Synchronistically Identified Common Morality Mind, which would form a Self-awareness based Synchronistically Identified Moral Common Logic Reality.

In relation to a Common Library of Self-awareness based Moral Behaviour, it would become a Synchronistically Identified Common Library of Self-awareness based Moral Behaviour, which would reflect the Nature of Moral Synchronicity and Moral Identity.

 

Nature of Moral Synchronicity and Moral Identity

Nature is Attitudinal Feeling, which Suggests Attitudinal Behaviour. Attitude is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment. Feeling is an expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence. Therefore, Nature is the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels about an environment. 

Morality is a product of Experience-based Intelligence, which forms Experiential Judgement. Synchronicity is a product of Experience-based Creative Intelligence, which forms a Coordinative Impulse. Identity is a product of Experience-based Conscious Intelligence, which forms Intellectual Preferentiality. 

Moral Synchronicity is Coordinated Experiential Judgement. Moral Identity is Preferential Experiential Judgement. In combination, Coordinated Experiential Judgement and Preferential Experiential Judgement would form Coordinated Preferential Experiential Judgement. In simple terms, it would form a Consciously Coordinated Morality. Or, a Morally Coordinated Consciousness.

A Moral Nature, which is Virtue, is the position a Body takes in relation to its Moral Feelings about the Self, about the environment, and about the experiences it has within an environment.

A Morally Synchronised Nature would be the position a Body takes in relation to its Coordinated Moral Feelings about the Self, about the environment, and about the experiences it has within the environment.

A Morally Identified Nature would be the position a Body takes in relation to its Conscious Moral Feelings about the Self, about the environment, and about the experiences it has within the environment. 

In combination, a Synchronistically Identified Moral Nature would be the position a Body takes in relation to its Consciously Coordinated Moral Feelings about the Self, about the environment, and about the experiences it has within the environment.

In relation to a Synchronistically Identified Morality Mind, it would form a Self-awareness based Consciously Coordinated Moral Behaviour....a Subconsciously Impulsive Moral Behaviour....a Morally Coordinated Collective Consciousness. 

 

Sensory Singularity of the Unconscious Mind

Is there an Unconscious Mind? If there were, it would be impartial, neutral, or impersonal. In essence, it would be without Motive, which is Personal Thought, Personal Opinion, Personal Agenda, or Consciousness. 

Is there such a thing as the Collective Unconscious? Assuming that there is no Personal Thought within the Unconscious Mind, and therefore no Personalisation, division, or partition within that Mind, an Unconscious state would be a Collective within itself. It would still have Imagination and Intellect, of which Awareness, Morality, and Synchronicity are products. It would also have Self-awareness, Passion, Reason, Nature, Respect, and any other impersonal state or trait. However, it would be without Motive, of which Belief and Identity are products. Therefore, it would be without WILL, Free WILL, Faith, Instinct, Intuition, Compassion, Personal Conscience, or Comfort Zones. They are all products of Motive or Personal Thought, which is Consciousness.

All products of Desire would have no role in the Unconscious Mind. Therefore, Justice and its products would also be missing. This would include Social, Intuitive, or Karmic Justice, as well as Instinctual Justice. They are Personalised products of Unconscious Reason. 

If the previous statements are correct, Virtual Reality would not exist within the Unconscious state. Why would this be assumed?

Virtual Reality is an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought. It is an Altruistically formed Instinct, which is a Personalised product of Common Logic that creates a Personalised product of Awareness Logic, which is a Sensory Singularity of Creative Logic. 

Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts...a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Feeling, which is an expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence. Logic is a Library Of Growing Intelligent Concepts, which is Memory. Common Logic is a Library of Common Sense Agreements, which is Common Sensory Memory. Creative Logic is a Library of Creative Intelligence, or Intelligent Imagination, which is Creative Memory. Awareness Logic is a Library of Intelligent Awareness, which is a Library of Sensory Impulses....programmed, reflex responsive, or Impulsive Creative Memory. Personalised Common Logic is a Conscious Library of Common Sense Agreements...a Conscious or Motivational Common Sensory Memory. Personalised Awareness Logic would be a Consciously or Motivationally programmed, reflex responsive, or Impulsive Creative Memory, which would be Subconsciously Creative. In combination, it would form a Consciously or Motivationally programmed, reflex responsive, or Impulsive Creative and Common Sensory Memory.... a Virtualised Environmental construct of Mind....a Virtual Reality, which would be Subconscious. 

If Virtual Reality is a product of Subconscious sensations, or Conscious Sensory Impulses, which would be a product of a Consciously programmed Mind, would an Unconscious Mind Dream? Is a Sleep-related Dream an Unconscious Dream, or is it a Subconscious Dream? If it were a Subconscious Dream, it would be Personally programmed, which means it would be a product of Conscious Sensory Impulses. If that is the case, what would be an Unconscious Dream?

To be an Unconscious Dream, it would not have any Personal or Conscious Input. There would be no distinction of separation or division. If that is the case, a whole would have no recognition of parts. A whole would not have parts! Therefore, how could an Unconscious Mind Dream if it had no concept of variation? If it had no concept of variation, it could not visualise or reflect upon variation. What would that be like? 

If an Unconscious Mind began to visualise its Thoughts, and then reflected upon those visualisations, could it recognise those visualisations as products of Self? What is Self? 

Is Self a Thought or Opinion? Is it a response to a condition? Is a condition a response? Are they the same thing? Is Thought a Singularity? If so, Self would be a Singularity. How would a Singularity become the many?

If Self is Thought, and Self is a Singularity, could Thinking bring about many interpretations or variations of Self? Could those variations of Self develop Preferences? If so, they could develop Identities. Those Identities could develop Personalities. However, would a Singularity of Thought still be a Singularity of Thought if it developed many different and conflicting variations of Self through Self-interpretation? 

If Mind is an accumulation and categorisation of Thoughts, it would be an accumulation and categorisation of Self-interpretations. If it is a Logical construct initiated or Suggested by Feeling, it would be a Self-perpetuating Behavioural Memory....Self-initiated, Self-suggested, and Self-evident accumulations of a procreating Singularity. In essence, a Universe of Galaxies reflects an evolving Mind of a procreating Singularity....a procreating SELF. 

In reflection, a Singularity of Thought could mean of One Opinion. Or, it could mean that a Singularity of Thought is an Agreement of Opinion. In essence, an Opinion is an Agreement. Could One Opinion develop variations of that Opinion? Could an Agreement develop variations of that Agreement? Could Thought develop variations of Thought? Could SELF develop variations of Self?

Is Consciousness a result of that process? Or, is Consciousness the process? Is it a Personalisation of Opinion, Agreement, Thought, or Self?

Personalisation is a reflection of Self, a reflection of Thought, a reflection of Opinion, or a reflection of Agreement. Is Virtual Reality that reflection? Is a Dream of Mind a Personalisation of Thought, Opinion, Agreement, or Self? Is Consciousness the Unconscious Mind reflecting upon the infinite possibilities of SELF? 

 

Rectification

Intellect is Receptive and Constructive Thought, which takes on board and builds upon concepts. Morality is a product of Experience-based Intelligence. It determines what is acceptable and unacceptable to take on board and build upon through Experiential Judgement. 

In essence, Rectification is Corrective. It makes Intelligent adjustments to any field of Thought that has been determined to be unacceptable through Experiential Judgement. It is a product of Morality. 

When Self-awareness becomes a product of Rectification, it is Intelligently adjusted in accordance with Experiential Judgement. This produces a Rectified Emotional/Suggestive Logic Agreement. When that Logic Agreement is Attitudinally expressed, it creates a Rectified Nature Agreement of Self-awareness....a Rectified Self-awareness based Attitudinal Behaviour, or Rectification-based Self-control....a Sensory Singularity of the Unconscious Mind. 

 

Synchronised Rectification

If we combined Rectified Self-awareness based Attitudinal Behaviour, or Rectification-based Self-control, with Synchronised Self-awareness based Attitudinal Behaviour, or Synchronicity-based Self-control, we would create Synchronistically Rectified Self-awareness based Attitudinal Behaviour, which is a Coordinative Rectification-based Self-control. It would also create Virtuous Mutual Respect, which is Morally Synchronised Attitudinal Behaviour and Morally Synchronised Awareness-based Behaviour. In essence, it would be Morally Coordinated Awareness-based Attitudinal Behaviour, which would be an Unconsciously Coordinated Impulse or Reflex Response. Therefore, the Rectification process would be Coordinated through Synchronicity.....an Unconsciously Coordinated Rectification.

If we created a Common Logic Reality of Synchronised Rectification, it would form an Attitudinal expression of Self-assessing Self-awareness, the Nature or Attitudinal Behaviour of Introspection, which is Introspective Self-control.

Previously, Introspection was labelled as Unity-awareness. However, in this instance, Introspection forms within Synchronised Common Sense Impressed Self-awareness. Therefore, it would be Synchronised or Coordinative Introspection.

In essence, Introspection is Experiential Common Sense Impressed Self-awareness. Therefore, Synchronised Introspection would be a product of Synchronised Experiential Common Sense Impressed Self-awareness.

Through an Unconsciously Coordinative Rectification, all conflicting Mindstates, and the Collective Consciousness, could be brought into alignment. Therefore, all Virtualised Environmental constructs, all Dreams of Mind, or all Interactive Visualisations of Conscious Thought could become reflections of a Common Morality. 

This is a link to a video that shows the Common Logic structure of Synchronised Rectification that creates 'Introspective Self-control': https://www.dropbox.com/s/3v55x3vr9v0is52/Introspective%20Self-control.mp4?dl=0

 

Introspective Self-control

Introspection is a product of Creatively Interactive/Experienced Self-awareness, which produces a Self-assessing Self-awareness. In dictionary terms, it is 'examining one's own Thoughts and Feelings'.

Self-control is a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness. Introspective Self-control is a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of Introspection, a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of a Self-assessing Self-awareness, which creates a Moral-based Introspective Nature. In essence, it is Morally examining one's own Attitudinal Behaviour.....one's own Nature. 

 

Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness

What would it take to create an Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness? What would define an Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness? 

Consciousness is a product of Motive-based/Personal Thought. An Unconscious state has no Motive or Personal Thought. Morality is Experiential Judgement. An Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness would be Morally Synchronised. To be Unconsciously Coordinated, Consciousness would have to be Synchronised or Coordinated through Impersonal or Neutral Thought. In essence, Neutrality is impartial. However, Morality is not. It determines what is acceptable or unacceptable to take on board and build upon through Experiential/Interactive Intelligence. Therefore, an Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness would need to be Unconsciously Self-assessing. To be more precise, it would need to be a Morally Coordinated Unconscious Self-assessment. This would be achieved through Synchronised Introspective Self-control, which is a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of a Self-assessing Self-awareness. 

Reality, as we know it, is a far cry from being an example of Morally Synchronised Consciousness. Therefore, what would it take to bring about the changes necessary to create such a Reality? Unconscious Rectification! As previously stated, Rectification is Moral-based, or to be more precise, it is an Experiential Progression of Morality. It is essentially Corrective, or Remediative. Therefore, Unconscious Rectification is Unconsciously Remediative. It makes Unconscious corrections according to a Coordinative Experiential Intelligence. 

A Conscious Mind is a product of Personal Thought. It is also Personality-based. A Personality is an Identified Attitudinal Behaviour. Mind, in general, could have an infinite number of Identified Attitudinal Behaviours. Or, in context, it could be Memory of an infinite number of Identified Attitudinal Behaviours. Therefore, a Dream of Mind could include many or all of those Personalities, or Personal Realities. If this is correct, how would we bring all of those Personalities into a Unified state?

Christ Will, not tainted by religious connotations, is an expression of Desire that wishes no harm to any Being, and seeks not to take advantage of their vulnerable circumstances or conditions. It is a product of Experience-based Intellectual Will Agreements. If we create a product of Identity-based Self-control, or Evolvability-based Virtuous Personalities, regulated by Christ Will, all Identified Attitudinal Behaviours of Mind could become expressions of an Unconsciously Coordinated Self-assessing Self-awareness. When combined with Harmony-based Self-control, a Morally Coordinated Attitudinal expression of Harmony-based Self-awareness, and Remediation-based Self-control, an Experiential Moral-based Attitudinal expression of Remediation-based Self-awareness, all Personalities of an Unconsciously Self-controlled Desire-based or Will-based system could create and reflect Peace of Mind. 

 

Application

If Consciousness is Unconscious Potential pondering its own existence, those ponderings created questions that manifested infinite possibilities into Self-perpetuating Virtual Realities or Dreamstates, and through Conscious experience it manifested conflict and confusion from the inevitable contradictions that infinite possibilities could create, how would Unconscious Potential bring Peace to its conflicted Dreamstates? 

Put simply, a recognition of conflict compared to a Wish for Peace would inevitably manifest solutions. However, a Wish is a Desire, which is Motive-focused Imagination. Motive is Personal/Conscious Thought. Therefore, a Wish for Peace could only come from Conscious experience. If this is correct, it would not be Unconscious Potential that sought Peace. It would be Conscious experience within the conflicted Dreamstates of Unconscious Potential that sought Peace. Therefore, the Personalities (or Personal Realities) of Mind would initiate the solutions necessary for Rectification. 

If Thought is Visualised into Conscious Dreamstates as an innate function of Unconscious Potential, and these Dreamstates are really Mindstates, accumulations and categorisations of Thought, accumulations and categorisations of an evolving Mind or Dream, could an understanding of the basic mechanisms of that process allow us to reach beyond the Self-perpetuating Dream and into a Thematically Virtualised Dreamstate? If so, what are the basic mechanisms? 

Language is a constructive form of recognition. Therefore, understanding the Language of Mind, or the designs of Thought that determine a particular Mindstate, could allow us to Consciously fabricate a Desired Reality. It could also allow us to Rectify unacceptable realities in order to reflect a particular Theme. In theory, all Mindstates could be brought into line with that Theme.

The real question is, "how do we Apply the Theory"? Or, are all Mindstates already Theme-based? And, does the Theme evolve?

If this is the case, and we have a powerful Desire to change the existing Theme, would that be enough? 

Memory produces an interesting dilemma. What we have experienced, and what we have concluded from those experiences, could interfere with any Desired change. This could occur because of Comfort Zones, or because of previous traumatic experiences. Fear of leaving a Comfort Zone, or of experiencing similar traumas, could severely retard a Theme change. Especially if the new Theme required a completely new Mindset. The previous fundamentals of Thought may no longer make sense to the new Mindset. Therefore, a completely new way of Thinking may be required to allow the new Mindset to form its foundations. 

How would we overcome this problem? It could take years of reprogramming to develop the new foundations. Even then, Memory may hinder the reprogramming. Would we need to wipe certain experiences from Memory? Is that even possible? And, could there be unfortunate repercussions caused by that erasure? 

From previous experience, or from recognition of historical events, a strong Will has been known to go beyond Logical explanation. Individuals have achieved things that many others had deemed impossible. They were only deemed impossible because of a limited understanding of Potential. Or, from a limited means of expressing Potential. What does this mean? 

Quite often, education can create hurdles. Indoctrination is probably a better word. Humans, and other Life-forms, can become institutionalised as a consequence of repetitive input or environmental conditioning. Therefore, indoctrination can create a limited means of expressing Potential. It keeps us in a bubble of Intelligence. 

Intellect takes on board and builds upon concepts. It is receptive and constructive Thought. Rigid Thinking, or strict adherence to Logical Thought, can prevent the evolution of Intelligence. Also, that strict adherence can retard Awareness, which is a Conclusive Agreement of focused Creative Thought, or focused Imagination. If focused Imagination is contained within a bubble, it is only aware of what has been taken on board and built upon through a strict adherence to Logical Thought. 

We are all aware of the term, 'thinking outside the box'. In Geometrical Thought Harmonics, Common Logic is represented by a Cube. Therefore, a Common Logic Reality is based upon what is in the Box. In essence, Common Logic is Common Memory. Or, to be more precise, Common Behavioural Memory....Memory of Nature....Memory of Attitudinal Behaviour.

Attitude is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment. If that environment is a product of restricted Awareness and restricted Intelligence, the Attitudinal Behaviour of Bodies within that environment will be reflections of restricted Awareness and restricted Intelligence. In simple terms, what we take on board and build upon is going to determine who we are, what we create, how we behave, and what we accept as truth. 

 

Bursting the Bubble

What happens when our bubble is recognised as a detriment to the expansion of Self-awareness?

As previously stated, Self-control is a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness. It is Self-awareness-based Virtuous Attitudinal Behaviour. In simplicity, it is Self-awareness-based Experiential Attitudinal Behaviour, which is the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels about its experiences as a Self-aware entity. In essence, it is an Unconsciously programmed position with no Personal input.

Conscious Self-control is the position a Body takes in relation to how it Feels about its Conscious experiences as a Self-aware entity. Therefore, that position would be Personally programmed....a subconscious reflex response or impulse. 

Inevitably, through Conscious experience and Personal Preference, we are going to want change if our environment is harmful to our Good Health and Well Being.

Usually, Life-forms adapt to their changing environment. However, if that environment is becoming more harmful, it may be a better option to create a better environment, as well as a better us. Otherwise, tolerating a harmful environment is going to wear thin. However, it isn't just the environment that can cause harm. Life-forms can cause harm to the environment, as well as to one another. Therefore, the environment and the Life-forms are usually in a state of flux. Both are influencing Attitudinal changes that may or may not be beneficial to one another.

To clarify, an environment is usually Attitudinally transformed by its inhabitants. This relates to the Atmosphere and Behaviour of a Planet. The inhabitants are usually Attitudinally transformed by the environment. This usually relates to Bodily adjustments and Behaviour of the inhabitants. In context, this could be defined as a symbiotic evolution. Regarding Mind, this could be defined as a Self-perpetuating Dreamstate. 

Due to the instability of WILL-based or Desire-based systems, or the Free Will and Faith variants, these Self-perpetuating Dreamstates are undesirable competitive systems that are Personal Preference-based. These systems have always been problematic. Therefore, a complete system-change will be necessary if we wish to have Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for All that is and All that will ever Be. 

Desire-based components will still remain. However, they will be Unconsciously coordinated. This is a necessary change to prevent the Desire-based or Will-based dominance that we are experiencing at present from causing catastrophic environmental corruption.

The new system will be a Self-awareness-based system. Or to be more precise, a Self-control system, which is a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness.....a Self-awareness-based Nature rather than a Motive-based or Preferentiality-based Nature. This is the Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness that was previously mentioned.

A video link was previously added on this page under the heading of 'Self-awareness-based Common Morality Mind', which shows the basic Unconscious infrastructure that the Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness evolved from. This is the link:  

https://www.dropbox.com/s/zd5esjqlmh7uxxv/Self-control-based%20Common%20Morality%20Mind.mp4?dl=0://://

 

Is there a more simple explanation of why Desire-based or Will-based systems are a disaster waiting to happen? 

Let's start from the beginning. Unconscious Potential is what I have previously labelled as Pure Potential, an infinite source of possible Thoughts. Consciousness is Unconscious Potential questioning or pondering its existence. It is Motive-based or Personal Thought.

An innate ability of Potential is to Visualise its Thoughts into Dreams, which are essentially Mindstates. They are accumulations and categorisations of Thought. It is Unconscious Potential becoming Conscious within interactive Visualisations of Conscious Thought.....Virtualised Environmental Constructs of Mind. 

Desire is a Motive-based Sense, which is a Wish....a Personal Sense....Personally or Consciously focused Imagination, which is Personally or Consciously focused Creative Thought. Will is an expression of Desire, an expression of Personally or Motivationally focused Imagination. Free Will is an expression of Personally or Motivationally focused Imagination Suggested by Belief or Choice, which is a declaration of Personal Preference. 

A Personality is an Identified Attitudinal Behaviour of Mind, a Personal Reality of Mind. As Thought is Visualised into Dreamstates, Personalities Visualise their Personal Preference-based Desires into Dreamstates. The more Personalities that there are, the more complex the Dreamstates would become. If those Personal Preference-based Desires are not complementary, the Dreamstates could become contradictory, confused, or conflicted. 

Interaction allows an entity to influence and be influenced by an environment. Therefore, entities influence their circumstantial surroundings or conditions, as well as being influenced by those circumstantial surroundings or conditions. If Personalities have incompatible Personal Preference-based Desires, the circumstantial surroundings or conditions would be influenced by those incompatibilities. If those Personal Preference-based Desires were conflictive, the environment would be influenced by conflict. Therefore, conflict and incompatibility would be reflected throughout the Dreamstate. 

If Desire-based or Will-based systems are not Unconsciously coordinated or Synchronised, catastrophic Environmental corruption can occur. Therefore, a Will-dominated environment could inevitably self-destruct due to wars, climate-based catastrophies, and other planetary and extraplanetary environmental impacts, which simply reflect the Visualised Thoughts of competitive and disassociated Personalities.  

 

The End Of Time

Time is a product of Consciousness. It is Desire-based. If we create a new system of Self-respect and Self-control that no longer has Desire or Will, Time will cease to exist. All Life-forms would become Self-governing and Self-sustained through Self-respect and Self-control. 

What would Life be like without Time? There would be no Old Age Deterioration. As a matter of fact, there would be no deterioration at all anywhere in Life. No illness or disease, and no injury or Death.

All deterioration reflects a corrupted and fragmented Mindstate. How would that have happened? Pure Potential, as previously stated, is Unconscious Potential. Consciousness is Unconscious Potential pondering the infinite possibilities of Self. In essence, it is questioning its own existence and reflecting upon the possible answers through an Interactive Visualisation of Conscious Thought.

These are the Dreams of Consciousness, which are products of Motive-based or Personal Thought. Desire is Motive-based focused Creative Thought, which is Motive-based focused Imagination. Will is an expression of Desire. Intuition is impressed by Desired Awareness, and expressed through Personalised or Conscious Attitudinal Behaviour....Conscious Nature. It also Suggests Choices. Faith is an expression of Desire, Suggested by Trust....Belief-based or Choice-based Behaviour. Personality is a product of Nature, Suggested by Identity.....Identified Attitudinal Behaviour. 

In a Desire-based or Will-based system, Personality is still a product of Nature, but it is impressed and expressed by Desire. It is impressed by Intuitive Desire and expressed by Faith-based Desire. In essence, Faith is Trust-based Free Will. 

In this new system, not the one regulated by Christ Will, all Desire-based and Will-based Thought will cease to exist. Personality would be a product of Identity-based Self-control. Evolvability would also be a product of Identity-based Self-control. However, Personality would be a component of Moral Identity-based Nature, which would create Virtuous Personalities. Those Personalities, and also Evolvability, would be Unconsciously coordinated. They would be complementary aspects of Mind, rather than competitive and opportunistic. Through these changes, Mind would be at Peace. Nothing is more important!

Why would we create this reality rather than the one where Free Will is regulated by Christ Will?

Will is essentially dominant in any Desire-based system. Therefore, even though it would be Unconsciously regulated, it could still evolve to regain dominance. This has always been the case in Desire-based systems. They eventually implode because Will is a pure expression of Desire. It Will always dominate other Traits of Mind. 

In the grand scheme of things, Evolvability-based Self-control, which is Personal Responsibility, would be complemented by Harmony-based Self-control, Rectification-based Self-control, and Synchronised Introspective Self-control. Harmony-based Self-control would create Morally Synchronised Attitudinal Behaviour, which is Virtuous Mutual Respect. Rectification-based Self-control would create Remedial Prescription-based Attitudinal behaviour.

This entire system would be Morally Self-assessing, Morally Coordinated, Morally Rectified, and Morally Conscious......Morally Identified.

This is a link to a video showing the structure of Identity-based Self-control, which creates Personal Responsibility.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/e9nz1wellmjuvzt/Identity-based%20Self-control%20-%20Personal%20Responsibility.mp4?dl=0://   

This is a link to a video showing the external sphere of Evolvability, Harmony, Remediation, and Synchronised Introspective Self-respectful Self-control. It is the best option for creating an Unconsciously Coordinated Moral Consciousness. And, it can still Evolve. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ta688luy1oa38mi/Evolvability%2C%20Harmony%2C%20Remediation%2C%20and%20Synchronised%20Introspective%20Self-respectful%20Self-control.mp4?dl=0://

What would Life be like without Desire or Will? Due to an Unconscious Coordination of complementary, Self-respectful, and Self-controlled Personalities, Thought would manifest instantly because there would be no opposition or competition. Everything that manifested into the Dream of Mind would reflect Peace, Harmony, Good Health and Well Being for All that is and All that will ever Be. Also, a Desire-based or Will-based system partitions the Mind with disassociated Desire-based or Will-based Memories of Identity. In the new system, the so-called Akashic records becomes our accumulated and accessible Memory. And, therefore, all Personality-based or Identity-based Attitudinal Behavioural Memory is shared. What one experiences, all experience. 

In our present reality, or Personal Reality, we have manifested reflections of disassociation. The Brain symbolises and reflects a disassociated Mindstate. All Body-related components also reflect disassociation. They reflect a need to be sustained by finite resources and environmental criteria that have been accepted as necessary for good health and well Being. Disassociated reflections will always be subject to volatility and Temporal displacement. 

In our present state of Mind, we have accepted opposites as necessary to Life. Opposites represent opposition or polarity, which is positive and negative Thought/opinion. Therefore, to manifest Thought into reality we are hindered by opposition. This produces Time-governed manifestations. They are determined by Will-based hierarchical dominance. The stronger the Will, or the more influence one can have on any opposition, the more chance of bringing one's Thoughts into a Virtualised state. It is always a struggle between a 'for and against' Mentality. 

Politics is the art and science of influencing others. It is a process of manipulation. Different Political factions fight for the right to be right. The more influence one can have over other factions, the more chance of experiencing that right to be right.

In essence, this reflects a fragmented and partitioned Mind with a Dissociative Identity Disorder. In the new system of Self-control, that disorder would be Remedied. Therefore, the Dreams of Mind become playgrounds, instead of battlefields. 

If this new reality is ushered in, what would the Universe look like? If Stars are Desire-based or Will-based, what would happen to them? If Galaxies are Desire-based or Will-based, what would happen to them? What if the Universe is Desire-based or Will-based? If our Bodies are Desire-based or Will-based, what would happen to them? The Mind boggles!

Let's take a look at the present Birth and Death process. Some creatures are born with the ability to fend for themselves. Humans are born with no idea of how to sustain Life. They are completely reliant upon a Guardian. What does that reflect within the Dreams of Mind? I think the answer to that is fairly simple. It reflects reliance upon something other than our own Potential. A need to be nurtured and taught how to fend for ourselves. It reflects a disassociation from our Potential. As a new Personality, it is the beginning of Memory, Identity-based Attitudinal Behavioural Memory to be precise. A new partition within the Mind. A blank slate. 

Now, let's look at Death. What does it symbolise within the Dreams of Mind? If a newborn was educated in the ways of Potential, and not in the ways of disassociation and reliance upon finite resources, what sort of Personality would manifest? If it was taught that certain criteria were necessary for survival, and without them it would cease to exist, what would happen if those criteria were no longer available or accessible? Would it Self-destruct?

Is death the result of a Belief system? An unfortunate result of disassociation from an inherent source. From Unconscious Potential. 

All creatures are products of Memory. In this reality, they are products of restricted or Personal Memory. They are products of the choices and responses of their parents....the experiences of their parents.....the programming of their parents. It can be an arduous task to change the way you were programmed. It is the equivalent of rewriting a popular and strongly Believed story. This can be accentuated when the author, whether that is parental or academic, is highly respected. 

How would we go about reprogramming the Identity Mind, or Individuality Mind? In essence, it is an experiential Belief Mind. A product of Choices. 

I think we have already explained what needs to be done through an Unconsciously Programmed Identity-based Self-control. However, what remains to be seen is the process. 

As stated previously, Identity-based Self-control is Personal Responsibility, which creates Unconsciously Evolved Self-awareness-based Virtuous Personalities. This means that all Personalities Evolve from a Collective Consciousness....a Unified state of Personal Thought....a Unified Motive.

As they are Self-awareness-based, they are products of a Sensory Singularity of Attitudinal and Common Sensory Awareness. Being Self-control-based, they are Moral-based Attitudinal expressions of that Sensory Singularity. Therefore, all Personalities become Moral-based Attitudinal expressions of that Sensory Singularity....Identified Attitudinal Behaviours of a Moral-based Collective Consciousness.   

 

Causation

Would there be any unfortunate consequences by eliminating Desire and Will-based Thought? What would be a good alternative to Desire-based Thought? 

Passion is a product of Emotional/Suggestive Awareness, which is a Love-based Sense Agreement. It cooperates with the Emotional/Suggestive Awareness of Self-awareness. In essence, Passion is a Love to create and a Love for what is created. In a Desire-based or Will-based system, Passion produces Personal or Will-based Ambition, which can be volatile at the very least. 

In a Desire-based or Will-based system, Desired Awareness and Desired Choice produces Intuitive Nature, which is Navigational Consciousness. It is Personalised Guidance of Feeling.

Attitudinal and Common Sensory Awareness produces Self-awareness. In a Desire-based or Will-based system, Self-awareness produces Compassion, which is Motive-based Self-awareness. However, Compassion is dependent upon Personal agenda, which is usually erratic and exclusive.

In the new system, Self-awareness produces Introspection, which is examining one's own Thoughts and Feelings.....a Self-assessing Self-awareness. When Attitudinally expressed, Self-awareness produces Self-control, which is the Moral-based Nature of Self-awareness. Therefore, Self-control is a good alternative to Intuition. Introspective Self-control is even better....a Self-assessing Self-awareness-based Moral Nature.  

What would be a good alternative to Will, which is a dominant expression of Desire? As mentioned, Passion is a Love to create and a Love for what is created. In the new system, Passion can produce Ambition. However, it is an Unconsciously regulated Ambition. Therefore, an Unconsciously regulated Ambition could be an alternative to Will.  

In a Desire-based or Will-based system, Common Logic produces Instinct, which is Personalised Guidance of Attitudinal Behavioural Memory. What would be a good alternative to Instinct? In the new system, Common Logic produces Attitudinal Behavioural Memory that is accessible to all. In essence, it would be the so-called Akashic records, which is an accumulation of all Thoughts.....the Universal Mind. 

From the information given, there may not be any unfortunate consequences to eliminating Desire-based or Will-based Thought. 

How would Bodies be sustained in the new system? Body is a reflection of Mind. Therefore, when a Mindstate evolves, the Bodies reflected by that Mindstate evolve. From my understanding, entities within the new reality would not consume. They would be Self-sustained. How could that Be? 

Unconscious Potential is an infinite source of possible Thoughts, which is an infinite source of Energy. When Unconscious Potential is Visualised into a Dreamstate, it becomes purposed Energy, or purposed Thought, which has an agenda or intention. In the present reality, Life-forms consume purposed Energy, or purposed Thought. This reflects a disconnect from the source. By disconnect, we mean unaware of their own Potential, which is an infinite source of Energy. Everything is Energy, which is Thought.

A Life-form is a Motive-based entity. A Personality is an Identified Attitudinal Behaviour. It is the position a Body takes in relation to its Preferentiality-suggested Feelings about the Self, about the environment, and about the experiences it has within the environment. In essence, a Personality is a Virtual Dreamer within the Mind/Dream of Purposed/Intentioned Potential. However, a Personality reflects a partition within the Mind/Dream. As Pure Potential is the initial or fundamental Dream-maker, a Personality is one of the infinite possible Identity-based Attitudinal Behaviours that have been reflected into the Mind/Dream of the initial Dream-maker. However, up until now, Personalities have been rarely Aware of what they reflect. In essence, they are Pure Potential in an evolving state of recognition. A delegation of possible Identities witnessing the evolution of their own Mind. 

 

What happens when a Personality begins to awake within the Dream/Mind? Initially, it would be subject to its conditioning. Therefore, it would start to experiment on its Personal and environmental circumstance. As its skillset expands, and its Passion evolves, a state of Bliss may be achieved. However, this state of Bliss could hinder further experimentation if a Personality determines this Bliss to be 'the Awakening'. Usually, it is an overwhelming pleasure from Personal Ambition, which is still Desire-based.

Many Personalities become embedded in their triumphant Blissful state....the permanent smile! Quite often, they have an overwhelming urge to teach others to attain this permanent smile. This all sounds great. However, if a Personality does not develop any further than the permanent smile, we just end up with a lot of smiling faces that usually try to distance themselves from a reality that may threaten the continuation of that smile. This does nothing more than continue the partitioned state. 

When an awakening Personality learns to control the Bliss, and not allow it to overwhelm the senses, the journey may continue toward the true Awakening.  

Ascension is not a quest to escape an unacceptable environment. It is a quest to take responsibility for that environment. From Introspection, we can go back in time to when the environment was created. This is achieved, not by Intuition alone, but through an evolution of Self-awareness. In combination, and when the Guidance of Intuition has reached its extent, Self-control, which is a Moral-based Attitudinal expression of Self-awareness, takes us beyond the Memories of Time. 

 

Beyond the Memories of Time

How do we go beyond the Memories of Time, beyond the Time-determined records of Consciousness?

History is a record of events, a story of Time. Within a partitioned state of Mind, all stories evolve from Personal interaction or experience.....from a Feedback of interactive Personal responses. This becomes an evolution of generational intelligence and Awareness. However, it also includes Belief or Choice. Therefore, it becomes an evolving story of Choice-based Intellectual and Awareness-based responses. In essence, it is a story of what we have accepted as Truth, and what we would prefer to be True. 

When SELF becomes an observer of its Beliefs, rather than a product of those Beliefs, it can determine what is best for its future growth. How would that occur? It is fairly simple! If what we have become doesn't Feel right, and our environment doesn't Feel right, then it probably isn't. Therefore, we have to look for the determining factors that led to what we have become, and then make the necessary corrections to lead us towards what we would rather Be, and to where we would rather Be.

If our Beliefs have led us to where we are, and to what we have become, and we don't like the result, then maybe it is those Beliefs or Choices that need to be changed. We must examine all Beliefs or Choices with analytical Thought.

Traditions are products of Belief. In essence, they are products of Personal, Cultural, Religious, Ancestral, or Academic Choice-based Behaviour. Therefore, they are products of Trust, which is volatile at best. Also, traditions can be continued through Respect, which is Awareness-based Behaviour, even if we don't Believe in the basis of the tradition. Many wars have been fought, out of Respect for Tradition.  

If we eliminate all Desire-based or Will-based Thought, would the Memories of that Thought remain? Would they still be accessible to the Desire-based or Will-based Personalities that created them? And, would they really want them to remain? 

In essence, if the Desire-based or Will-based Personalities of Mind are transformed into Self-control-based Personalities, the transformed Personalities may not remember the experiences of previous Times. If Time no longer exists, Chronological Memories may not exist. Or, they may not be accessible by the transformed Personalities. They may not be able to associate with or relate to those Memories. 

If Universal Memory becomes accessible to the transformed Personalities, Chronological Memories may be accessible, but, as previously stated, may not be distinguishable as their own. It may be like reading a book that has no recorded author. Or, those transformed Personalities may accept all Memories as a record of their evolving Mind. The latter sounds more likely. It would probably be like investigating and reading about one's heritage or ancestry....one's family story. 

 

Integrity

'Integrity' can mean Honesty, Unity, Moral Cohesion, lack of corruption, and Wholeness. If we combine Personal Responsibility, which is Identity-based or Evolvability-based Self-control, with Synchronicity-based or Harmony-based Self-control, Rectification-based or Remediation-based Self-control, and Synchronised Introspective Self-control, it creates what has been commonly defined as a Chakra......Chemical History, Acquired Karmic Resonance Activation.

Chemical History is Memory of interactions and responses. Karma is 'cause and effect'....Kinetic Attitude Response Manifested Accordingly. Resonance can be defined, in dictionary terms, as the power to evoke enduring images, memories, and Emotions. Therefore, a Chakra could be a storehouse of environmental experiences, and reactions to those experiences. It could also Suggest how to Behave or react according to those experiences. 

In essence, a Chakra needs Memory. Self-awareness is a product of Emotional Logic, or Emotional Intellect Agreements, which is Suggestive Memory. Intellect takes on board and builds upon concepts. It accumulates Thoughts into Memories. Nature is an Attitudinal expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence, which Suggests Attitudinal Behaviour. Attitude is the position a Body takes in relation to an environment. 

Self-control is Moral-based Attitudinal expressions of the Emotional/Suggestive Intellect Agreements of Self-awareness...the Emotional/Suggestive Logic/Memory of Self-awareness....Self-awareness-based Moral Nature. It is Self-awareness-based Virtue, or Virtuous Self-awareness. It Attitudinally expresses Emotional/Suggestive Memory.....the accumulated Feelings of experiential judgement. Therefore, it could be defined as a Chakra. 

The previously described combination of Identity-based, Synchronicity-based, Rectification-based, and Synchronised Introspection-based Self-control could produce a Chakra of Integrity. It could be better defined as Chakra Examination, Remediation, Harmonisation, and Evolution? A New Beginning!

There are three more structures of Self-control that are worth adding. One is Perceptive Intelligence-based Self-control, a combination of Hindsight and Foresight-based Self-control that creates an Attitudinal expression of Perceptive Morality, or Moral Perception, which creates a Moral-based Nature or Attitudinal Behaviour of Precognition, Extrapolation, and Prediction. Another is Reflective Intelligence-based Self-control, and the last is Reified Intelligence-based Self-control.

Reflection is to ponder upon a Thought or concept. It can be defined as a thing that is a consequence of, or arises from something else. "Body is a Reflection of Mind". Intellect takes on board and builds upon concepts. Therefore, Reflective Intelligence could be defined as a thing that is a consequence of, or arises from, a concept that has been taken on board and built upon in the Mind. 

Reification is Realisation. Therefore, Reified Intelligence, or Intelligent Reification, considers a Concept that has been taken on board and built upon in the Mind as Real! This could account for a Fear of the number Thirteen. A Fear of bringing One's Thoughts into Reality! On the other hand, it could be the Joy of bringing One's Thoughts into Reality. I suppose it depends upon the way WE are Thinking at the time. 

In essence, the last three structures of Self-control represent the Self-controlled VCR function of the Mind.....Visualisation - Concentration - Realisation. This is how Thought manifests into a Self-controlled Reality, which is an Unconscious Self-controlled Dream of Mind. 

This is a link to the video: VCR Self-control, which combines Perceptive Intelligence, Reflective Intelligence, and Reified Intelligence-based Self-control. It represents the Self-controlled VCR function of the Mind. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ag5mghelnfko64/VCR%20Self-control.mp4?dl=0://

This is a link to the video: Personal VCR Self-control, which combines Identity-based/Personal Intelligence-based, Perceptive Intelligence-based, Reflective Intelligence-based, and Reified Intelligence-based Self-control. This is how Thought manifests into a Personalised or Conscious Self-controlled Dream of Mind.  

https://www.dropbox.com/s/lmh3tndwgtqfjpt/Personal%20VCR%20Self-control.mp4?dl=0:// 

If we combine the 7 constructs of Self-control, we get a product of Synchronised Introspection-based, Harmony-based, which is Creative Intelligence-based, Rectification-based, which is Experiential/Moral Intelligence-based, Identity-based, which is Personal Intelligence-based, Perceptive Intelligence-based, which forms Hindsight and Foresight, Reflective Intelligence-based, and Reified Intelligence-based Self-control. This would manifest a Conscious Dream of Mind that is constantly assessed, corrected, and Coordinated/Synchronised. 

This is a link to the video: Morally Self-Coordinated Conscious Dream: 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/76cr0g0q8eixqtb/Morally%20Self-Coordinated%20Conscious%20Dream.mp4?dl=0://

If we add Perceptive Imagination-based Self-control, which is Insight-based, we get 8 constructs of Self-control. This gives us Perceptive Hindsight, Insight, and Foresight. Through Hindsight, we can learn from the past. Through Insight, we can reach a better understanding of a state of Mind by what we have learnt from Hindsight. Then, through Foresight, we can better predict future outcomes from present Mindsets. This is a link to the video: Enhanced Morally Self-coordinated Conscious Dream. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/w6ftd9hzncw9day/Enhanced%20Morally%20Self-coordinated%20Conscious%20Dream.mp4?dl=0://

 

Dissolution of Density

Within the Mind, what would Density reflect? In simple terms, Dense can mean compacted. A less favourable and more colloquial definition could refer to Ignorance.....as thick as two bricks! Unfortunately for us, the latter is more descriptive of our state of Mind.

Within the Dream that is Mind, it could refer to Dissociated Thought-forms attempting to avoid collision, corruption, and annihilation within a seemingly violent and incompatible space. In the grand scheme of things, space is not incompatible with us, we are incompatible with space. The incompatibility is a consequence of Dissociation within the Universal Mind/Dream....the Mind/Dream of Pure Potential. In the Mind/Dream, Space symbolises Pure Potential. Our Dissociation with and ignorance of that Potential, creates the incompatibility. 

Throughout Time, Symbols have become important as forms of Communication. They represent something, or Suggest something. In essence, all Suggestions are Emotional or Hypothetical. Therefore, Symbols should be regarded as referential.

Within the Dream that is Mind, everything is Symbolic. Therefore, a Dream is Emotional or Suggestive. Interpretations of those Suggestions are inferred to be Mental. They simply Detail or explain what is Suggested. Applications of those Detailed Suggestions are inferred to be Physical. They refer to the Practicality of a Suggestion or Symbol. However, in the Language of Thought, this is simply semantics. 

Through Perception, a dissociated Personality could declare what it sees as Physical. Then, through Perceptive Interpretion, it could attempt to label or document what it sees for future reference. The reference then becomes Suggestive. However, through Association, a Personality could see everything within the Dream that is Mind, or the Dream that is Life, as Suggestive of its own Potential. This could be regarded as Enlightenment. However, if a Personality Believes that it is a Creation of a Higher Power, or of a God, then everything within the Dream that is Mind is declared to be the Potential of that Higher Power or God. Through this Suggestion, a Personality declares itself to be subordinate to that Higher Power or God. 

Through Reflection, a Personality could ponder upon the possibilities of purpose. Through Reflective Interpretation, a Personality could declare its purpose to be God-given. Therefore, it could declare itself to be a servant of a Higher Power or God. Through this assumption, a Personality could perceive Density and Gravity as purposeful to that Higher Power or God. In this state of Mind, a Personality could declare everything that occurs within its so-called Life as necessary. Either as a reward for being a good servant, or as punishment for disobedience. However, if a Personality ponders upon the Dream that is Mind as Symbolic of its own evolution of Thought, and that Density and Gravity are simply illusions of that Thought, all restrictions could be seen as consequences of a gradual recognition and understanding of One's own Potential.

Through Reification, the Dream that is Mind could be regarded as Reality. In this state, and due to an innate ability of Potential to Visualise Thoughts into Dreams, Dissociated Personalities that have manifested from that Potential could Visualise their Beliefs into Reality.
In essence, the Dream that is Mind may be the closest thing we will get to Reality. Therefore, as Beliefs are Declarations of Personal Preference or Choice, dissociated Personalities could cause chaos within the Dream that is Mind. 

Density may only be overcome when the Dream that is Mind is recognised as a Visualisation of evolving Thought, rather than a concrete Reality that deteriorates due to an unfortunate misinterpretation of Consciousness that created Time-governed experiences.

"Consciousness is Unconscious Potential pondering the infinite possibilities of SELF, and accumulating those Visualised possibilities into the Dream that is Mind". Through the interactions of Self-interpretation, the Dream that is Mind evolves. 

 

Nature Agreements: Mindstate Builders

In Geometrical Thought Harmonics, Nature is depicted as an Octahedron, which has 8 Equilateral Triangle external or Physical facets, which are Experimental or Practical. It also has 3 centre-dissecting Square Emotional planes, which are Suggestive.
An Equilateral Triangle depicts the Creative Thought of Imagination. A Square depicts the Receptive and Constructive Thought of Intellect, which takes on board and builds upon concepts. 
If we place Octahedrons on their edges, with Cuboctahedron axes, and have them rotated on their edges to form Polygonal external planes, they form Nature Agreements. The overlapping edges of those Octahedrons form junctions and points that build the Logic states of those Nature Agreements. In essence, the Emotional planes of those Nature Agreements form the Emotional Intellect Agreements of Emotional Logic, which is Suggestive. In reference to those statements, 2 Octahedrons of Nature would form Square polar planes and a Square Emotional plane. The intersecting edges would form the points of a Cube of Common Logic within the Intellect-polarised Nature Agreement. This Intellect-polarised Nature Agreement is unbiased and forms a Common Mindstate or Intellect-based Behavioural Memory. 
Mind is a Logical construct initiated by Feeling, which is an expression of Emotional/Suggestive Intelligence. LOGIC is a Library Of Growing Intelligent Concepts, which is Memory. Feeling Suggests behaviour. Nature is Attitudinal Feeling, which Suggests Attitudinal behaviour. Therefore, Mind is Behavioural Memory. 
The picture on the left shows 2 Octahedrons of Nature forming the Intellect-polarised Nature Agreement. The picture in the centre shows the Cube within the Intellect-polarised Nature Agreement that is formed by the intersections of the Octahedron edges. The picture on the right shows the Intellect-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement within the Intellect-polarised Nature Agreement. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The picture below left shows the Intellect-polarised Nature Agreement with its initial Nature axis. The picture below right shows the initial Nature axis exposed within the Nature Agreement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The next Nature Agreement is formed by 3 Octahedrons of Nature that create polar centre-point Hexagon planes and an Emotional centre-point Hexagon plane of Awareness. The polar centre-point Hexagon planes are formed by 3 Emotional Intellect planes that create an Awareness-based Emotional Intellect Agreement of Tolerance. This becomes a Tolerant Nature Agreement. The intersections of the Octahedron edges form a Hexagon Prism of Love Logic, which is a Reflex Responsive, Programmed, or Impulsive Logic, and 2 overlapping Equilateral Triangle prisms of Creative Logic that create a Love-based, programmed, or experiential Creative Logic. This Nature Agreement forms an Awareness-based Behavioural Memory or Mindstate. 
The picture on the left shows the 3 Octahedrons of Nature that form the Tolerant Nature Agreement. The picture in the centre shows the Hexagon Prism of Love Logic and the 2 overlapping Equilateral Triangle Prisms of Creative Logic that are formed by the intersections of the Octahedron edges. The picture on the right shows the Awareness-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement of Tolerance within the Tolerant Nature Agreement. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The picture below left shows the Tolerant Nature Agreement with the Awareness-based Feeling of Respect axis. The picture below right shows the Awareness-based Feeling of Respect exposed. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The next Nature Agreement is formed by 5 Octahedrons of Nature forming polar Decagon planes of Belief or Choice and a Decagon Emotional plane of Belief or Choice. This becomes an Affirmative Nature Agreement because 5 Emotional Intellect planes form a Belief-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement that represents Affirmation. The intersecting edges of the Octahedrons form 4 Logic states within the Nature Agreement. These Logic states form a Belief-based Behavioural Memory or Mindstate.
The first is a Decagon Prism of Belief-polarised Logic. The next is 2 overlapping Pentagon Prisms of Motive-polarised Logic. The next is a Decagram Prism that forms a Belief-polarised Logic Interpretation. Next, is 2 overlapping Pentagram Prisms that form Motive-polarised Logic Interpretations. The overlapping Polygon facets are interactive. Therefore, they are experiential forms of those Traits e.g. 2 overlapping Pentagon Prisms form an external Decagon plane that becomes Belief-interactive or experiential Motive Logic. Also, Pentagon-polarised Prisms represent Motive Logic Applications. Pentagram-polarised Prisms represent Motive Logic Interpretations. Decagon-polarised Prisms represent Belief Logic Applications, and Decagram-polarised Prisms represent Belief Logic Interpretations. All Grammic forms are Interpretative. 
The picture on the left shows the 5 Octahedrons of Nature that form the Affirmative Nature Agreement. The picture in the centre shows the 4 Logic states within the Nature Agreement that are formed by the intersections of the Octahedron edges. The picture on the right shows the Belief-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement of Affirmation within the Affirmative Nature Agreement. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The picture below left shows the Affirmative Nature Agreement with its Belief-based Feeling of Trust axis. The picture below right shows the Belief-based Feeling of Trust exposed. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The next Nature Agreement is a product of 7 Octahedrons of Nature forming polar Tetradecagon planes of Hindsight and an Emotional Tetradecagon plane of Hindsight.
Hindsight is a product of Perception, experiential Perception to be more precise. This Nature Agreement produces a Hindsight-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement, which is the Emotional Logic of this Hindsight-based Behavioural Memory or Mindstate. 
What is a Hindsight-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement? As Hindsight is a form of Perception that seeks an understanding of the past, and Emotional Logic is an Agreement of Suggestive Intelligence, this Logic state Suggests what to take on board and build upon from past experience. In essence, it is an understanding of cause and effect. 

The picture on the left shows the 7 Octahedrons of Nature that form the Hindsight-polarised Nature Agreement. The picture in the centre shows the six Logic states that are formed by the intersections of the Octahedron edges. It has a Tetradecagon Prism of Hindsight Logic, 2 overlapping Heptagon Prisms of Perceptive Logic, a Tetradecagram Prism of Hindsight Logic Interpretation, 2 overlapping Heptagram Prisms of Perceptive Logic Interpretation, a different Tetradecagram Prism of Hindsight Logic Interpretation, and 2 different Heptagram Prisms of Perceptive Logic Interpretation. The picture on the right shows the Hindsight-polarised Emotional Intellect Agreement that is a product of the Suggestive Emotional Intelligence of the 7 Octahedrons of Nature. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The picture below left shows the Hindsight Nature Agreement with its Hindsight-based Feeling axis. The picture below right shows the Hindsight Nature Agreement with its Hindsight-based Feeling exposed. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a link to the PDF "Nature Agreements: Mindstate Builders". gallery/Nature Agreements.pdf

It will be updated progressively. This update was made on Sunday 16th June 2024 at 1:09 PM.

Name of Site

Page title

This text should be replaced with information about you and your business This text should be replaced...

contact email: brian@alkamirr.com
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@ALKAMIRR